fstrent-planning
Scannednpx machina-cli add skill wrm3/ai_project_template/fstrent-planning --openclawfstrent Planning Skill
Create and manage comprehensive project plans, Product Requirements Documents (PRDs), and feature specifications using the fstrent_spec_tasks planning system. This Skill provides structured planning workflows that prevent over-engineering while ensuring thorough requirements gathering.
System Overview
The fstrent_spec_tasks planning system uses:
- PLAN.md:
.fstrent_spec_tasks/PLAN.md- Main Product Requirements Document - Features:
.fstrent_spec_tasks/features/- Individual feature specifications - Project Context:
.fstrent_spec_tasks/PROJECT_CONTEXT.md- Project goals and scope - Tasks: Links to
.fstrent_spec_tasks/TASKS.mdfor implementation tracking
PRD Structure
File Location
Single mandatory file: .fstrent_spec_tasks/PLAN.md
10-Section PRD Template
1. Product Overview
- 1.1 Document title and version: PRD title and version number
- 1.2 Product summary: 2-3 paragraph overview
2. Goals
- 2.1 Business goals: Business objectives
- 2.2 User goals: What users aim to achieve
- 2.3 Non-goals: Explicitly out-of-scope items
3. User Personas
- 3.1 Key user types: Primary user categories
- 3.2 Basic persona details: Brief persona descriptions
- 3.3 Role-based access: Permissions and access levels
4. Features
- 4.1 Core Features: Feature list with priorities (High/Medium/Low)
- 4.2 Feature References: Links to individual feature documents
5. User Experience
- 5.1 Entry points & first-time user flow: Initial access patterns
- 5.2 Core experience: Main user workflows
- 5.3 Advanced features & edge cases: Less common scenarios
- 5.4 UI/UX highlights: Key design principles
6. Narrative
Single paragraph describing user journey and benefits
7. Success Metrics
- 7.1 User-centric metrics: Task completion, satisfaction
- 7.2 Business metrics: Conversion, revenue impact
- 7.3 Technical metrics: Performance, error rates
8. Technical Considerations
- 8.1 Affected subsystems: Primary and secondary systems
- 8.2 Integration points: External system interactions
- 8.3 Data storage & privacy: Data handling, compliance
- 8.4 Scalability & performance: Load expectations, targets
- 8.5 Potential challenges: Risks and technical hurdles
9. Milestones & Sequencing
- 9.1 Project estimate: Small/Medium/Large with time estimate
- 9.2 Team size & composition: Required team structure
- 9.3 Suggested phases: Implementation phases with deliverables
10. User Stories
Individual user stories with:
- ID: US-001, US-002, etc.
- Description: As a [persona], I want to [action] so that [benefit]
- Acceptance Criteria: Specific, measurable outcomes
Feature Management
Feature Document Structure
Location: .fstrent_spec_tasks/features/{feature-name}.md
Template:
# Feature: [Feature Name]
## Overview
[Brief description of the feature]
## Requirements
- [Requirement 1]
- [Requirement 2]
## User Stories
- **US-001**: As a [persona], I want to [action] so that [benefit]
- **US-002**: As a [persona], I want to [action] so that [benefit]
## Technical Considerations
- **Subsystems**: [List affected subsystems]
- **Dependencies**: [List feature dependencies]
- **Integration Points**: [List integration requirements]
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] [Criterion 1]
- [ ] [Criterion 2]
## Related Tasks
- Links to tasks in TASKS.md that implement this feature
- Links to bugs in BUGS.md that affect this feature
Feature Naming Convention
- Lowercase with hyphens:
user-authentication.md,payment-processing.md - Descriptive and specific
- Matches feature name in PLAN.md
Feature-Task Integration
- Tasks reference features via
feature:field in YAML - Feature documents list implementing tasks
- Feature completion tracked through task completion
- CRITICAL: Feature files MUST be created when 2+ tasks share same feature (see FEATURE_GUIDELINES.md)
Scope Validation
Mandatory Questions (Ask Before Creating PRD)
Purpose: Prevent over-engineering and clarify requirements
1. User Context & Deployment
"Intended for personal use, small team, or broader deployment?"
- Personal (1 user): Simple, file-based, minimal security
- Small team (2-10): Basic sharing, simple user management
- Broader (10+): Full authentication, role management, scalability
2. Security Requirements
"Security expectations?"
- Minimal: Basic validation, no authentication
- Standard: User auth, session management, basic authorization
- Enhanced: Role-based access, encryption, audit trails
- Enterprise: SAML/SSO, compliance, advanced security
3. Scalability Expectations
"Performance and scalability expectations?"
- Basic: Works for expected load, simple architecture
- Moderate: Handles growth, some optimization
- High: Speed-optimized, caching, efficient queries
- Enterprise: Load balancing, clustering, horizontal scaling
4. Feature Complexity
"How much complexity comfortable with?"
- Minimal: Core functionality, keep simple
- Standard: Core plus reasonable conveniences
- Feature-Rich: Comprehensive with advanced options
- Enterprise: Full-featured with extensive configuration
5. Integration Requirements
"Integration needs?"
- Standalone: No external integrations
- Basic: File import/export, basic API
- Standard: REST API, webhooks, common integrations
- Enterprise: Comprehensive API, message queues, enterprise systems
Over-Engineering Prevention Rules
Apply these defaults unless explicitly requested:
- Authentication: Don't add role permissions unless requested
- Database: Use simple file-based unless DB explicitly requested
- API: Don't add comprehensive REST beyond required
- Architecture: Default monolith unless scale requires separation
Planning Questionnaire
27-Question Framework
Use this comprehensive questionnaire for thorough requirements gathering. Ask questions progressively, not all at once.
Phase 1: Project Context (Q1-Q7)
Q1: Primary problem this system solves?
- Follow-up: Who experiences it, how handled today?
Q2: What does success look like?
- Follow-up: How measured, failure indicators?
Q3: Replacing existing or creating new?
- If replacing: pain points
- If new: why needed now?
Q4: Primary users?
- End users, Admins, Stakeholders, External
Q5: User count?
- Single, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 200+
Q6: Usage frequency?
- Occasional, Daily, Continuous, Peak periods
Q7: Access locations?
- Local, Office, Remote, Internet, Mobile
Phase 2: Technical Requirements (Q8-Q16)
Q8: Deployment?
- Local desktop, Local server, Cloud, Hybrid, No preference
Q9: Maintenance comfort?
- Minimal, Basic, Intermediate, Advanced
Q10: Integration needs?
- AD, Databases, Business apps, Monitoring, Backup
Q11: Data types?
- Public, Internal, PII, Financial, Healthcare, Regulated
Q12: Security requirements?
- Basic, Industry compliance, Government, Custom, None
Q13: Access control?
- All see all, Role-based, Department, Individual, External
Q14: Performance expectations?
- Basic seconds, Good <1s, High instant, Not critical
Q15: Data volume?
- Thousands, Hundreds of thousands, Millions, Billions, Growing
Q16: Peak usage?
- Consistent, Business hours, Month/quarter, Seasonal, Event-driven
Phase 3: Feature Scope (Q17-Q22)
Q17: Essential features (MVP)?
- List core features and deal-breakers
Q18: Nice-to-have features?
- List convenience and future enhancements
Q19: Features to avoid?
- Over-complexity, specific integrations, approaches
Q20: Priority: ease vs power?
- Ease, Power, Balanced, Depends on user
Q21: Interface examples you like?
- Reference apps, patterns, accessibility
Q22: User training investment?
- Self-explanatory, Brief, Formal, Complex OK
Phase 4: Timeline & Resources (Q23-Q27)
Q23: Timeline drivers?
- Business deadline, Budget, Competition, Regulatory, Personal
Q24: Delivery preference?
- Quick prototype, Phased, Complete, Iterative
Q25: Trade-offs?
- Core over polish, Polish over features, Speed over performance
Q26: Available resources?
- Dev time, Expertise, Budget, Third-party services
Q27: Hard constraints?
- Specific tech, No cloud, Budget limits, Policies
Questionnaire Best Practices
- Ask 3-5 questions per message to avoid overwhelming
- Start with most important questions
- Follow up based on answers
- Conclude when clear sense of functionality emerges
Codebase Analysis (Existing Projects)
When to Use
When initializing fstrent_spec_tasks in existing projects with code
Analysis Process
-
File Structure Analysis
- Identify main components and modules
- Determine project organization patterns
- Map directory structure to functionality
-
Dependency Mapping
- Map relationships between components
- Identify external dependencies
- Document integration points
-
Feature Extraction
- Identify features from code patterns
- Determine feature boundaries
- Group related functionality
-
Subsystem Identification
- Group related functionality into subsystems
- Define subsystem boundaries
- Document subsystem responsibilities
-
Integration Discovery
- Find external system connections
- Identify APIs and services used
- Document data flows
Analysis Outputs
- Generate PLAN.md based on current code structure
- Create feature documents for each major component
- Identify subsystems from code organization
- Document current architecture and integration points
Planning Operations
Create New PRD
Process:
- Conduct scope validation (5 essential questions)
- Optionally run planning questionnaire (27 questions)
- Create
.fstrent_spec_tasks/PLAN.mdwith 10-section template - Fill in all sections based on gathered requirements
- Create feature documents in
features/folder - Link features to PLAN.md
Update Existing PRD
Process:
- Read current PLAN.md
- Identify sections to update
- Make changes while preserving structure
- Update version number
- Update related feature documents if needed
Create Feature Document
Process:
- Validation: Check if feature file needed (see FEATURE_GUIDELINES.md decision tree)
- Multiple tasks (2+) for same feature? → REQUIRED
- Multi-component feature? → REQUIRED
- Has user stories? → REQUIRED
- Single isolated task? → SKIP
- Determine feature name (lowercase-with-hyphens)
- Create
.fstrent_spec_tasks/features/{feature-name}.md - Use feature template from FEATURE_GUIDELINES.md (complete or minimal)
- Fill in overview, requirements, user stories
- Specify technical considerations
- Add acceptance criteria
- List all related tasks
- Reference in PLAN.md section 4.1 (if creating from PRD)
CRITICAL: When creating tasks:
- Create feature file BEFORE marking first task as [📋]
- Update feature file as new tasks are added
- Keep task files and feature files synchronized
View Project Plan
Process:
- Read
.fstrent_spec_tasks/PLAN.md - Display relevant sections
- Optionally read related feature documents
- Show project context from PROJECT_CONTEXT.md
Integration with Other Systems
Link to Tasks
- Tasks reference features via
feature:YAML field - Feature documents list implementing tasks
- Track feature progress through task completion
Link to Bugs
- Bugs reference affected features
- Feature documents list related bugs
- Feature impact assessment through bug analysis
Link to Project Context
- PLAN.md aligns with PROJECT_CONTEXT.md mission
- Features support project goals
- Scope boundaries defined in both documents
File Organization
Core Planning Files
.fstrent_spec_tasks/PLAN.md- Main PRD.fstrent_spec_tasks/features/- Feature documents.fstrent_spec_tasks/PROJECT_CONTEXT.md- Project goals
Auto-Creation
Automatically create missing folders and files:
.fstrent_spec_tasks/directory.fstrent_spec_tasks/features/subdirectoryPLAN.mdwith blank template if missingPROJECT_CONTEXT.mdwith template if missing
Instructions
Proactive Feature File Validation
When creating tasks, ALWAYS:
- Check Feature Field: Look at task YAML
feature:field - Validate Feature File Exists: Check if
.fstrent_spec_tasks/features/{feature-name}.mdexists - Apply Decision Rules:
- If 2+ tasks share same feature AND no feature file → CREATE FEATURE FILE NOW
- If multi-component feature AND no feature file → CREATE FEATURE FILE NOW
- If task has user stories AND no feature file → CREATE FEATURE FILE NOW
- If single isolated task → Feature file optional
- Create Before [📋]: Feature file MUST exist before marking task as [📋]
- Update Synchronously: When adding new tasks to existing feature, update feature file
Feature File Creation Triggers
Automatic triggers (create feature file without asking):
- Creating 2+ tasks with same feature name
- Creating master task with sub-tasks
- Task references feature that doesn't exist yet
Prompt user (ask if feature file needed):
- Creating single task that might expand later
- Unclear if task is part of larger feature
- User mentions "might add more features later"
Validation Messages
When creating feature file, inform user:
"Creating feature file: features/user-authentication-system.md
This feature has multiple related tasks, so a feature file is required
for coordination and tracking."
When feature file already exists:
"Feature file exists: features/user-authentication-system.md
Updating with new task reference."
When feature file NOT needed:
"Single isolated task - no feature file needed.
Using category tags only."
Best Practices
PRD Creation
- Always conduct scope validation first
- Use planning questionnaire for complex projects
- Be specific about non-goals
- Include concrete user stories
- Define clear success metrics
Feature Management
- One feature per file
- Clear, descriptive names
- Link to implementing tasks
- Track acceptance criteria
- Update as requirements evolve
- CRITICAL: Create feature file BEFORE marking first task as [📋]
- Use decision tree in FEATURE_GUIDELINES.md to determine if feature file needed
- Keep feature files and task files synchronized
Scope Control
- Apply over-engineering prevention rules
- Default to simplicity
- Add complexity only when justified
- Document scope boundaries clearly
- Regular scope reviews
Requirements Gathering
- Ask questions progressively
- Validate assumptions
- Clarify ambiguities
- Document decisions
- Get stakeholder buy-in
Common Workflows
Workflow: Create Task with Feature Validation
NEW: Enforced workflow to ensure feature files are created when needed
- User requests: "Create tasks for implementing user authentication"
- Analyze request to identify if feature file needed:
- Will there be multiple tasks? → YES → Feature file REQUIRED
- Multi-component (frontend + backend + database)? → YES → Feature file REQUIRED
- Has user stories? → Check with user
- If feature file needed:
a. Create feature file FIRST:
.fstrent_spec_tasks/features/user-authentication-system.mdb. Fill in feature template (use minimal template for simpler features) c. Add overview, user stories, acceptance criteria - Create first task file in
.fstrent_spec_tasks/tasks/ - Add feature reference to task YAML:
feature: User Authentication System - Update feature file "Related Tasks" section with first task
- Mark first task as [📋] in TASKS.md
- Create additional task files
- Update feature file with each new task
- Mark additional tasks as [📋]
- Confirm all files created and synchronized
Validation Prompts:
- "This appears to be a multi-task feature. I'll create a feature file first."
- "Feature file created: features/user-authentication-system.md"
- "Task file references feature in YAML frontmatter"
- "Feature file updated with task in Related Tasks section"
- "Ready to mark as [📋]"
Workflow: Create PRD for New Project
- User requests: "Create a project plan for a task management app"
- Ask scope validation questions (5 essential)
- Optionally ask planning questionnaire questions
- Create
.fstrent_spec_tasks/PLAN.mdwith 10 sections - Fill in sections based on answers
- Create feature documents for core features
- Link features in PLAN.md section 4
- Confirm PRD created
Workflow: Add Feature to Existing Plan
- User requests: "Add a reporting feature to the plan"
- Read existing PLAN.md
- Ask clarifying questions about feature
- Create
.fstrent_spec_tasks/features/reporting.md - Fill in feature template
- Update PLAN.md section 4.1 to include new feature
- Confirm feature added
Workflow: Conduct Scope Validation
- User requests: "Help me plan a new project"
- Ask: "Intended for personal use, small team, or broader deployment?"
- Ask: "Security expectations?"
- Ask: "Performance and scalability expectations?"
- Ask: "How much complexity comfortable with?"
- Ask: "Integration needs?"
- Summarize answers and recommend approach
- Proceed with PRD creation
Workflow: Analyze Existing Codebase
- User requests: "Create a plan for this existing project"
- Analyze file structure
- Identify main components
- Extract features from code
- Map dependencies
- Generate PLAN.md based on analysis
- Create feature documents for major components
- Confirm analysis complete
Examples
Example: Create Simple PRD
User: "Create a plan for a personal todo list app"
Action:
-
Conduct scope validation:
- Personal use (1 user)
- Minimal security
- Basic performance
- Minimal complexity
- Standalone
-
Create
.fstrent_spec_tasks/PLAN.md:
# PRD: Personal Todo List App
## 1. Product overview
### 1.1 Document title and version
- PRD: Personal Todo List App
- Version: 1.0
### 1.2 Product summary
A simple, personal todo list application for managing daily tasks. The app allows a single user to create, organize, and track tasks with basic features like due dates and priorities. Designed for simplicity and ease of use without unnecessary complexity.
## 2. Goals
### 2.1 Business goals
- Provide personal productivity tool
- Maintain simplicity and ease of use
- Minimize maintenance overhead
### 2.2 User goals
- Quickly add and organize tasks
- Track task completion
- Set priorities and due dates
- View tasks at a glance
### 2.3 Non-goals
- Multi-user support
- Team collaboration features
- Complex project management
- Mobile apps (web only)
- Cloud sync
## 3. User personas
### 3.1 Key user types
- Individual user managing personal tasks
### 3.2 Basic persona details
- **Solo User**: Individual managing personal todo list for daily tasks and projects
### 3.3 Role-based access
- Single user with full access to all features
## 4. Features
### 4.1 Core Features
- **Task Management** (Priority: High)
- Create, edit, delete tasks
- Mark tasks as complete
- Set due dates
- Assign priorities (High/Medium/Low)
- **Task Organization** (Priority: Medium)
- Group tasks by category
- Filter by status, priority, due date
- Search tasks
- **Task Persistence** (Priority: High)
- Save tasks to local file
- Load tasks on startup
### 4.2 Feature References
- task-management.md
- task-organization.md
- task-persistence.md
[Continue with remaining sections...]
- Create feature documents in
features/ - Confirm: "Created PRD for Personal Todo List App with 3 core features"
Example: Add Feature
User: "Add a recurring tasks feature"
Action:
- Read existing PLAN.md
- Create
.fstrent_spec_tasks/features/recurring-tasks.md:
# Feature: Recurring Tasks
## Overview
Allow users to create tasks that automatically repeat on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly).
## Requirements
- Define recurrence pattern (daily, weekly, monthly)
- Automatically create new task instances
- Option to complete or skip individual instances
- Edit or delete recurring series
## User Stories
- **US-010**: As a user, I want to create recurring tasks so that I don't have to manually recreate regular tasks
- **US-011**: As a user, I want to modify recurrence patterns so that I can adjust schedules as needed
## Technical Considerations
- **Subsystems**: Task Management, Task Persistence
- **Dependencies**: Core task management feature
- **Integration Points**: Task creation, task storage
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] User can set recurrence pattern when creating task
- [ ] New task instances created automatically
- [ ] User can complete individual instances
- [ ] User can edit or delete entire series
- [ ] Recurrence data persisted correctly
## Related Tasks
- Task to implement recurrence UI
- Task to implement recurrence logic
- Task to update persistence layer
- Update PLAN.md section 4.1:
- **Recurring Tasks** (Priority: Medium)
- Create tasks with recurrence patterns
- Automatic task instance creation
- Manage recurring series
- Confirm: "Added Recurring Tasks feature to plan"
Compatibility Notes
This Skill works with the same file format used by Cursor's fstrent_spec_tasks planning system. Plans and features created in Claude Code can be viewed and updated in Cursor, and vice versa. The system uses:
- Standard markdown format
- Consistent section structure
- Git-friendly plain text files
- Cross-IDE compatible templates
Teams can use both IDEs interchangeably for planning activities.
Source
git clone https://github.com/wrm3/ai_project_template/blob/main/.claude/skills/fstrent-planning/SKILL.mdView on GitHub Overview
The fstrent-planning skill creates and manages project plans, PRDs, and feature specifications using the fstrent_spec_tasks system. It provides structured planning workflows to gather requirements and prevent over-engineering while ensuring thorough documentation. It enforces feature file creation for multi-task features as outlined in the guidelines.
How This Skill Works
Planning is organized around PLAN.md (.fstrent_spec_tasks/PLAN.md), a set of feature documents in .fstrent_spec_tasks/features/, and PROJECT_CONTEXT.md for goals and scope. Requests mentioning plan, PRD, requirements, features, or scope trigger the workflow, with links to TASKS.md for implementation tracking. Feature documents follow the template located at .fstrent_spec_tasks/features/{feature-name}.md.
When to Use It
- You're planning a new project and need a formal roadmap.
- You're creating or updating a PRD or requirements document.
- You're defining features and scope, and need traceability between plans and tasks.
- You need to gather stakeholder requirements and align them with goals.
- You must validate scope and avoid over-engineering by documenting success criteria.
Quick Start
- Step 1: Create .fstrent_spec_tasks/PLAN.md with project goals and scope.
- Step 2: Add a PLAN-based PROJECT_CONTEXT.md and create .fstrent_spec_tasks/features/{feature-name}.md for each feature.
- Step 3: Link your PLAN.md to TASKS.md and start collecting requirements in PRD/Features docs.
Best Practices
- Start with PLAN.md to capture scope, goals, and success criteria.
- Create a dedicated feature document for each capability in .fstrent_spec_tasks/features/.
- Link PRDs to FEATURES and TASKS.md for traceability.
- Regularly review and update PROJECT_CONTEXT.md with evolving scope.
- Enforce naming, versioning, and review cycles per FEATURE_GUIDELINES.md.
Example Use Cases
- Plan a mobile app feature rollout with separate PRD and feature specs.
- Redesign an internal tool by creating a new PLAN.md and feature docs.
- Scope a multi-feature initiative by documenting each feature in features/*.md.
- Prepare a PRD for a new API integration and link it to tasks.
- Capture stakeholder requirements into a formal PRD for governance.