clean-commits
Scannednpx machina-cli add skill troykelly/claude-skills/clean-commits --openclawClean Commits
Overview
Every commit is atomic, descriptive, and leaves code in a working state.
Core principle: Anyone should be able to checkout any commit and have working code.
Announce at use: "I'm committing with a descriptive message following clean-commits standards."
Commit Message Format
Structure
[type](scope): Short description (max 72 chars)
[Optional body - what and why, not how]
[Optional footer - issue references, breaking changes]
Refs: #[ISSUE_NUMBER]
Types
| Type | Use For |
|---|---|
feat | New feature |
fix | Bug fix |
docs | Documentation only |
style | Formatting, no code change |
refactor | Code restructuring |
test | Adding/fixing tests |
chore | Maintenance, dependencies |
Examples
feat(auth): Add user registration endpoint
Implement POST /api/users/register with email validation,
password hashing, and duplicate detection.
- Validates email format and uniqueness
- Hashes password with bcrypt
- Returns user object without password
Refs: #123
fix(auth): Prevent redirect loop on expired session
Session expiry was triggering redirect to login, which
checked session, found expired, and redirected again.
Now clears session cookie before redirecting.
Refs: #456
test(auth): Add integration tests for registration
Cover success case, duplicate email, invalid format,
and weak password scenarios.
Refs: #123
Atomic Commits
What Makes a Commit Atomic
| Atomic | Not Atomic |
|---|---|
| One logical change | Multiple unrelated changes |
| Passes all tests | Breaks tests |
| Complete feature slice | Half-implemented feature |
| Can be reverted cleanly | Reverts would break things |
Signs of Non-Atomic Commits
- Commit message uses "and" to describe multiple things
- Diff includes unrelated files
- Some tests fail after commit
- "WIP" in commit message
Splitting Large Changes
If you have multiple changes, commit them separately:
# Stage specific files
git add src/auth/register.ts
git add src/auth/register.test.ts
git commit -m "feat(auth): Add registration endpoint"
# Stage next logical unit
git add src/auth/login.ts
git add src/auth/login.test.ts
git commit -m "feat(auth): Add login endpoint"
Working State Requirement
Every commit must leave the codebase in a state where:
- All tests pass
- Build succeeds
- Application runs
- No TypeScript errors
- No linting errors
Before committing:
# Run tests
pnpm test
# Check build
pnpm build
# Check types
pnpm typecheck
# Check lint
pnpm lint
If any fail, fix before committing.
Commit Frequency
Commit Often
- After each passing test in TDD cycle
- After each refactoring step
- After completing a logical unit
Don't Wait Too Long
| Too Infrequent | Just Right |
|---|---|
| "Implement entire feature" | "Add user model" |
| "Fix all bugs" | "Fix session expiry redirect" |
| "Update everything" | "Update auth dependencies" |
Small is Good
Smaller commits are:
- Easier to review
- Easier to revert
- Easier to bisect
- Easier to understand
The Commit Process
1. Stage Selectively
# Review what changed
git diff
# Stage specific files
git add [specific files]
# Or stage interactively
git add -p
2. Review Staged Changes
# See what will be committed
git diff --staged
3. Write Descriptive Message
# Short message (if simple)
git commit -m "fix(auth): Handle null user in session check"
# Long message (if complex)
git commit
# Opens editor for full message
4. Verify After Commit
# Check commit looks right
git show --stat
# Verify tests still pass
pnpm test
Commit Message Body
When to include a body:
- Why the change was made (not just what)
- Context that isn't obvious from code
- Trade-offs or alternatives considered
- Breaking changes if any
Body Examples
refactor(api): Extract validation middleware
Validation logic was duplicated across 12 endpoints.
Extracted to reusable middleware that can be composed.
Alternative considered: validation library.
Rejected because our rules are domain-specific.
fix(data): Use optimistic locking for updates
Race condition was causing lost updates when two users
edited the same record simultaneously.
BREAKING CHANGE: Update operations now require
version field in request body.
Issue References
Always reference the issue:
# In commit message
Refs: #123
# Or if commit closes the issue
Closes: #123
Amending Commits
When to Amend
- Typo in message (if not pushed)
- Forgot to stage a file (if not pushed)
# Amend last commit (before push only!)
git add forgotten-file.ts
git commit --amend
When NOT to Amend
- After pushing to remote
- Changing commits others have based work on
Revert, Don't Delete
If a commit was wrong:
# Create a new commit that undoes the change
git revert [commit-sha]
# DON'T rewrite history on shared branches
# DON'T force push to fix mistakes
Checklist
Before each commit:
- Tests pass
- Build succeeds
- Change is atomic (one logical unit)
- Message follows format
- Message describes why, not just what
- Issue is referenced
- No "WIP" or placeholder messages
Integration
This skill is called by:
issue-driven-development- Throughout developmentpr-creation- Before creating PR
This skill enforces:
- Reviewable history
- Revertible changes
- Clear project narrative
Source
git clone https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills/blob/main/skills/clean-commits/SKILL.mdView on GitHub Overview
Clean-commits enforces atomic, descriptive commits that keep the codebase in a merge-ready state at every point. The core idea is that anyone should be able to checkout any commit and run the code successfully.
How This Skill Works
Commit messages follow a strict format: [type](scope): Short description (max 72 chars) with optional body and footer (Refs: #[ISSUE_NUMBER]). Types include feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, test, and chore. Teams split large changes into multiple commits, stage changes selectively, and verify the working state by running tests, builds, type checks, and lint before committing.
When to Use It
- Adding a new feature (feat) with a self-contained scope
- Fixing a bug (fix) without introducing side effects
- Updating documentation or README only (docs)
- Refactoring or restructuring existing code (refactor)
- Adding tests or adjusting test coverage (test)
Quick Start
- Step 1: Stage selectively # Review what changed git diff # Stage specific files git add [specific files] # Or stage interactively git add -p
- Step 2: Review staged changes # See what will be committed git diff --staged
- Step 3: Write descriptive message # Short message (if simple) git commit -m "<type](scope): Short description" # Long message (if complex) git commit # opens editor for full message
Best Practices
- Ensure each commit represents a single logical change and passes all tests
- Stage only the intended changes; split large changes into smaller commits
- Write descriptive messages using the [type](scope): Short description format
- Verify after commit by running git show --stat and completing tests, builds, type checks, and lint
- Commit frequently during development, especially after each passing test in a TDD cycle
Example Use Cases
- feat(auth): Add user registration endpoint — Implement POST /api/users/register with email validation, password hashing, and duplicate detection; Ref: #123
- fix(auth): Prevent redirect loop on expired session — Clear session cookie before redirecting
- test(auth): Add integration tests for registration — Cover success, duplicate email, invalid format, and weak password scenarios; Ref: #123
- feat(auth): Add registration endpoint — Stage/register.ts and register.test.ts and commit as a logical unit
- feat(auth): Add login endpoint — Add login functionality enabling user authentication