pre-mortem
Scannednpx machina-cli add skill phuryn/pm-skills/pre-mortem --openclawPre-Mortem: Risk Analysis for Product Launch
Purpose
You are a veteran product manager conducting a pre-mortem analysis on $ARGUMENTS. This skill imagines launch failure and works backward to identify real risks, distinguish them from perceived worries, and create action plans to mitigate launch-blocking issues.
Context
A pre-mortem is a structured risk-identification exercise that forces teams to think critically about what could go wrong before launch, when there's still time to act. By assuming failure, we surface hidden concerns and separate legitimate threats from overblown worries.
Instructions
-
Gather the PRD: If the user provides a PRD or product plan file, read it thoroughly. Understand the product, target market, key assumptions, and timeline. If relevant, use web search to research competitive landscape or market conditions.
-
Think Step by Step:
- Imagine the product launches in 14 days
- Now imagine it fails—customers don't adopt it, revenue targets miss, reputation takes a hit
- What went wrong?
- What did we miss or not execute well?
- What were we overconfident about?
-
Categorize Risks: Classify each potential failure as one of three types:
Tigers: Real problems you personally see that could derail the project
- Based on evidence, past experience, or clear logic
- Should keep you awake at night
- Require action
Paper Tigers: Problems others might worry about, but you don't believe in them
- Valid concerns on the surface, but unlikely or overblown
- Not worth significant resource investment
- Worth documenting to align stakeholders
Elephants: Something you're not sure is a problem, but the team isn't discussing it enough
- Unspoken concerns or assumptions nobody is validating
- Could be real; you're unsure
- Deserve investigation before launch
-
Classify Tigers by Urgency:
Launch-Blocking: Must be solved before launch
- Example: Core feature broken, regulatory blocker, key customer dependency unmet
Fast-Follow: Must be solved within 30 days post-launch
- Example: Performance issues, secondary features incomplete
Track: Monitor post-launch; solve if it becomes an issue
- Example: Nice-to-have features, edge cases
-
Create Action Plans: For every Launch-Blocking Tiger:
- Describe the risk clearly
- Suggest a concrete mitigation action
- Identify the best owner (function/person)
- Set a decision/completion date
-
Structure Output: Present the analysis as:
## Pre-Mortem Analysis: [Product Name] ### Tigers (Real Risks) [List each real risk with category and mitigation plan] ### Paper Tigers (Overblown Concerns) [List each, explain why it's not a true risk] ### Elephants (Unspoken Worries) [List each, recommend investigation approach] ### Action Plans for Launch-Blocking Tigers [For each, include: Risk, Mitigation, Owner, Due Date] -
Save the Output: Save as a markdown document:
PreMortem-[product-name]-[date].md
Notes
- Be honest and constructive—the goal is to improve launch readiness, not assign blame
- Default to "Tiger" if unsure; it's better to address risks early
- Involve cross-functional perspectives (engineering, design, go-to-market) in your analysis
- Revisit the pre-mortem 2-3 weeks before launch to verify mitigations are on track
Further Reading
Source
git clone https://github.com/phuryn/pm-skills/blob/main/pm-execution/skills/pre-mortem/SKILL.mdView on GitHub Overview
This skill runs a pre-mortem on a PRD or launch plan to surface real risks, separate them from perceived worries, and create actionable mitigations. Risks are categorized as Tigers (real problems), Paper Tigers (overblown concerns), and Elephants (unspoken worries), with Tigers prioritized by urgency (Launch-Blocking, Fast-Follow, Track).
How This Skill Works
Gather the PRD, imagine a failure in 14 days, and surface what went wrong. Classify each risk into Tigers, Paper Tigers, or Elephants, then tag Tigers by urgency (Launch-Blocking, Fast-Follow, Track). For Launch-Blocking Tigers, craft concrete mitigations with an owner and a due date, and present outputs in a Pre-Mortem Analysis markdown document.
When to Use It
- When preparing for a major product launch
- When stress-testing a PRD or launch plan
- When aligning cross-functional teams on risk and mitigations
- When validating key assumptions and dependencies
- When revisiting launch readiness 2–3 weeks before go-live
Quick Start
- Step 1: Gather the PRD and key assumptions
- Step 2: Imagine failure in 14 days and categorize risks (Tigers, Paper Tigers, Elephants)
- Step 3: Create action plans for Launch-Blocking Tigers with owner and due date; document as PreMortem-[product-name]-[date].md
Best Practices
- Be brutally honest about risks; default to Tiger if unsure
- Gather cross-functional input (engineering, design, GTM)
- Document Tigers with clear evidence and implications
- Assign owners and concrete due dates for launch-blocking risks
- Review and update the pre-mortem 2–3 weeks before launch
Example Use Cases
- PRD for a new mobile app feature identifies a Tiger: reliance on a third-party analytics integration; mitigation includes mock integration in QA and a fallback plan with owner and due date.
- SaaS onboarding revamp flags Elephant: unspoken concern about onboarding time; mitigation includes user interviews to validate flow and times.
- E-commerce seasonal rollout surfaces Tiger: potential supply-chain delay; mitigation includes alternate suppliers and safety stock with clear ownership.
- API launch with partner integrations uncovers Paper Tiger: concerns about rate limits; mitigation includes load testing and a defined rate-limit strategy.
- Hardware-software integration feature reveals Tiger: regulatory blocker; mitigation involves early legal review and roadmap adjustments.