verification-before-completion
Scannednpx machina-cli add skill parthalon025/autonomous-coding-toolkit/verification-before-completion --openclawVerification Before Completion
Overview
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.
Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.
The Iron Law
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
The Gate Function
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
Common Failures
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|---|---|---|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
Red Flags - STOP
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- ANY wording implying success without having run verification
Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
Key Patterns
Tests:
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
Build:
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
Requirements:
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
Agent delegation:
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
Why This Matters
From 24 failure memories:
- your human partner said "I don't believe you" - trust broken
- Undefined functions shipped - would crash
- Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features
- Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework
- Violates: "Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced."
When To Apply
ALWAYS before:
- ANY variation of success/completion claims
- ANY expression of satisfaction
- ANY positive statement about work state
- Committing, PR creation, task completion
- Moving to next task
- Delegating to agents
Rule applies to:
- Exact phrases
- Paraphrases and synonyms
- Implications of success
- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness
The Bottom Line
No shortcuts for verification.
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.
Source
git clone https://github.com/parthalon025/autonomous-coding-toolkit/blob/main/skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.mdView on GitHub Overview
Verifying completion with fresh evidence is mandatory before any success claim. The core principle is evidence before claims, always, and no completion claims without fresh verification evidence.
How This Skill Works
Follow the Gate Function: identify the proving command, run the full fresh command, read the full output including exit codes and failures, verify that the output supports the claim, and only then state the claim with evidence. If verification fails, report the actual status with evidence and do not claim success.
When to Use It
- Before committing, pushing, or opening a PR to claim completion or passing status.
- When you plan to say tests pass or build succeeds.
- When reporting that a bug is fixed or a regression is resolved.
- Before delegating to agents or reporting agent success.
- Before moving to the next task or presenting progress to stakeholders.
Quick Start
- Step 1: Identify the command that proves your claim (e.g., tests, build, lint).
- Step 2: Run the full command in a fresh run and collect complete output.
- Step 3: Read the output, verify the claim, and report with evidence or state the actual status.
Best Practices
- Always identify the exact command that proves the claim before running it.
- Run the FULL command in a fresh environment and capture complete output.
- Read the entire output, verify the exit code, and count any failures.
- Only make a claim if the output confirms it with evidence; otherwise report status with evidence.
- Document and attach logs or diffs as evidence; never skip verification steps.
Example Use Cases
- Run the test suite; if exit code is 0 and there are 0 failures, claim 'all tests pass' with the full test output as evidence.
- Execute the linter in a fresh run; if 0 errors are reported, claim 'lint clean' and attach the linter log.
- Run the build command; if exit 0 and no build warnings, claim 'build passes' with the build log.
- Re-run the original failing test after a fix; if it passes, claim 'bug fixed' with the regression test results.
- Have an agent perform changes; verify the VCS diff shows the changes and report the actual state instead of trusting the agent's claim.