Get the FREE Ultimate OpenClaw Setup Guide →
w

Quality Gates

Verified

@wpank

npx machina-cli add skill @wpank/quality-gates --openclaw
Files (1)
SKILL.md
8.5 KB

Quality Gates

Enforce quality checkpoints at every stage of the development lifecycle. Each gate defines what is checked, when it runs, and whether it blocks progression.


When to Use

  • Before committing — catch lint errors, formatting issues, type errors, and secrets before they enter history
  • Before merging — ensure full test suites pass, coverage thresholds are met, and code has been reviewed
  • Before deploying — validate integration tests, security scans, and performance budgets in staging
  • During code review — verify that all automated gates have passed and manual review criteria are satisfied
  • After deploying — monitor health checks, error rates, and performance baselines

Gate Overview

GateWhenChecksBlocking?
Pre-commitgit commitLint, format, type-check, secrets scanYes
Pre-pushgit pushUnit tests, build verificationYes
Pre-mergePR/MR approvalFull test suite, code review, coverage thresholdYes
Pre-deploy (staging)Deploy to stagingIntegration tests, smoke tests, security scanYes
Pre-deploy (production)Deploy to productionStaging verification, load test, rollback planYes
Post-deployAfter production deployHealth checks, error rate monitoring, perf baselinesAlerting

Pre-commit Setup

Husky + lint-staged (Node.js)

{
  "lint-staged": {
    "*.{js,ts,tsx}": ["eslint --fix", "prettier --write"],
    "*.{json,md,yaml}": ["prettier --write"]
  }
}
npx husky init
echo "npx lint-staged" > .husky/pre-commit

Pre-commit framework (Python)

# .pre-commit-config.yaml
repos:
  - repo: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks
    rev: v4.6.0
    hooks:
      - id: trailing-whitespace
      - id: end-of-file-fixer
      - id: check-yaml
      - id: check-added-large-files
  - repo: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit
    rev: v0.6.0
    hooks:
      - id: ruff
        args: [--fix]
      - id: ruff-format
  - repo: https://github.com/pre-commit/mirrors-mypy
    rev: v1.11.0
    hooks:
      - id: mypy

Secrets Scanning (pre-commit hook)

#!/bin/sh
# .git/hooks/pre-commit
gitleaks protect --staged --verbose
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
  echo "Secrets detected. Commit blocked."
  exit 1
fi

CI/CD Gate Configuration

GitHub Actions

name: Quality Gates
on:
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  lint-and-typecheck:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm run lint
      - run: npm run typecheck

  unit-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm test -- --coverage
      - name: Check coverage threshold
        run: |
          COVERAGE=$(jq '.total.lines.pct' coverage/coverage-summary.json)
          if (( $(echo "$COVERAGE < 80" | bc -l) )); then
            echo "Coverage $COVERAGE% is below 80% threshold"
            exit 1
          fi

  security-scan:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - run: npm audit --audit-level=high
      - uses: gitleaks/gitleaks-action@v2

  build:
    needs: [lint-and-typecheck, unit-tests, security-scan]
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm run build

Set these as required status checks in branch protection rules so PRs cannot merge until all gates pass.


Coverage Gates

TypeMinimum ThresholdNotes
Unit tests80% line coveragePer-file and aggregate
Integration tests60% of integration pointsAPI endpoints, DB queries
E2E tests100% of critical pathsAuth, checkout, core workflows
No decrease rule0% regression allowedNew code must not lower overall coverage

Enforcing Thresholds

// jest.config.js or vitest.config.ts
{
  "coverageThreshold": {
    "global": {
      "branches": 75,
      "functions": 80,
      "lines": 80,
      "statements": 80
    }
  }
}

For the no decrease rule, compare coverage against the base branch in CI and fail if the delta is negative.


Security Gates

Dependency Scanning

EcosystemToolCommand
Node.jsnpm auditnpm audit --audit-level=high
Pythonpip-auditpip-audit --strict
Rustcargo auditcargo audit
Gogovulncheckgovulncheck ./...
UniversalTrivytrivy fs --severity HIGH,CRITICAL .

Secret Detection

ToolUse CaseCommand
gitleaksPre-commit and CIgitleaks protect --staged
TruffleHogDeep history scantrufflehog git file://. --only-verified
detect-secretsBaseline-aware scanningdetect-secrets scan --baseline .secrets.baseline

Performance Gates

Bundle Size Budgets

{
  "bundlesize": [
    { "path": "dist/main.*.js", "maxSize": "150 kB" },
    { "path": "dist/vendor.*.js", "maxSize": "250 kB" },
    { "path": "dist/**/*.css", "maxSize": "30 kB" }
  ]
}

Lighthouse CI Thresholds

{
  "ci": {
    "assert": {
      "assertions": {
        "categories:performance": ["error", { "minScore": 0.9 }],
        "categories:accessibility": ["error", { "minScore": 0.95 }],
        "categories:best-practices": ["error", { "minScore": 0.9 }],
        "first-contentful-paint": ["error", { "maxNumericValue": 2000 }],
        "largest-contentful-paint": ["error", { "maxNumericValue": 2500 }],
        "cumulative-layout-shift": ["error", { "maxNumericValue": 0.1 }]
      }
    }
  }
}

API Response Time Limits

Endpoint TypeP50P95P99
Read (GET)< 100ms< 300ms< 500ms
Write (POST/PUT)< 200ms< 500ms< 1000ms
Search/aggregate< 300ms< 800ms< 2000ms
Health check< 50ms< 100ms< 200ms

Enforce via load testing tools (k6, Artillery) in CI with pass/fail thresholds.


Review Gates

Required Approvals

Change ScopeApprovals Required
Standard code changes1 approval minimum
Infrastructure, auth, payments, data models2 approvals
Dependency updates, cryptographic changesSecurity team approval

CODEOWNERS

# .github/CODEOWNERS
*                    @team/engineering
/infra/              @team/platform
/src/auth/           @team/security
/src/payments/       @team/payments @team/security
*.sql                @team/data-engineering
Dockerfile           @team/platform

Gate Bypass Protocol

When Bypass Is Acceptable

  • Hotfixes for production incidents with active user impact
  • Trivial changes (typos, comments) where automated checks are overkill
  • Dependency updates that break CI due to upstream issues (not your code)

Required Documentation for Every Bypass

  1. Reason — why the gate cannot pass right now
  2. Risk assessment — what could go wrong by skipping
  3. Follow-up ticket — link to an issue that tracks resolving the bypass
  4. Approver — name of the senior engineer or lead who authorized the bypass

NEVER Do

  1. NEVER disable gates permanently — fix the root cause, don't remove the guardrail
  2. NEVER commit secrets — even to "test" branches; git history is forever
  3. NEVER skip tests to unblock a deploy — if tests fail, the code is not ready
  4. NEVER merge with failing required checks — admin merge bypasses erode team trust
  5. NEVER set coverage thresholds to 0% — even a low threshold is better than none
  6. NEVER bypass security scans for speed — vulnerabilities in production cost far more than CI minutes
  7. NEVER rely solely on post-deploy gates — catching issues after users are impacted is damage control, not quality
  8. NEVER treat alerting gates as optional — post-deploy monitoring exists because pre-deploy gates cannot catch everything; ignoring alerts defeats the purpose

Source

git clone https://clawhub.ai/wpank/quality-gatesView on GitHub

Overview

Quality Gates enforce checkpoints at every stage of the development lifecycle. Each gate defines what is checked, when it runs, and whether it blocks progression. This approach helps automate quality and ensure deployment requirements are met.

How This Skill Works

Gates are defined for each stage (pre-commit, pre-merge, pre-deploy, post-deploy). They run configured checks (lint, tests, security scans, performance budgets) and block progression if a gate fails. CI/CD integration ensures gates are enforced in pipelines and status checks surface in PRs and deployments.

When to Use It

  • Before committing — catch lint errors, formatting issues, type errors, and secrets before they enter history
  • Before merging — ensure full test suites pass, coverage thresholds are met, and code has been reviewed
  • Before deploying — validate integration tests, security scans, and performance budgets in staging
  • During code review — verify that all automated gates have passed and manual review criteria are satisfied
  • After deploying — monitor health checks, error rates, and performance baselines

Quick Start

  1. Step 1: Define gate criteria per stage (lint, tests, coverage, security) and decide which are blocking
  2. Step 2: Wire gates into your CI/CD (e.g., GitHub Actions) as jobs with required status checks
  3. Step 3: Establish bypass/rollback procedures and monitor gates post-deploy

Best Practices

  • Define explicit gate criteria for each stage and version them in your repo
  • Keep blocking thresholds aligned with project risk and coverage goals
  • Document bypass protocols and require authorization plus audit trails
  • Integrate gates with CI/CD dashboards and make gate results visible in PRs
  • Regularly review and update gate definitions as the codebase evolves

Example Use Cases

  • Node.js project uses Husky + lint-staged to run linting, formatting, and secrets checks before commit
  • Python project configures pre-commit with trailing-whitespace, end-of-file fixes, and mypy type checks
  • GitHub Actions workflow runs lint, typecheck, unit tests with coverage and enforces an 80% line coverage threshold
  • CI includes npm audit and gitleaks-action to detect security issues before merge or deploy
  • Post-deploy gates perform health checks and monitor error rates with alerting and performance baselines

Frequently Asked Questions

Add this skill to your agents
Sponsor this space

Reach thousands of developers