verification-before-completion
npx machina-cli add skill moiri-gamboni/praxis/verification-before-completion --openclawVerification Before Completion
Overview
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.
Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.
The Iron Law
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
The Gate Function
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
Common Failures
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|---|---|---|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
Red Flags - STOP
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- ANY wording implying success without having run verification
Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence does not equal evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter does not equal compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion does not equal excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
Key Patterns
Tests:
OK: [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
BAD: "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):
OK: Write -> Run (pass) -> Revert fix -> Run (MUST FAIL) -> Restore -> Run (pass)
BAD: "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
Build:
OK: [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
BAD: "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
Requirements:
OK: Re-read plan -> Create checklist -> Verify each -> Report gaps or completion
BAD: "Tests pass, phase complete"
Agent delegation:
OK: Agent reports success -> Check VCS diff -> Verify changes -> Report actual state
BAD: Trust agent report
When To Apply
ALWAYS before:
- ANY variation of success/completion claims
- ANY expression of satisfaction
- ANY positive statement about work state
- Committing, PR creation, task completion
- Moving to next task
- Delegating to agents
Rule applies to:
- Exact phrases
- Paraphrases and synonyms
- Implications of success
- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness
The Bottom Line
No shortcuts for verification.
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.
Source
git clone https://github.com/moiri-gamboni/praxis/blob/master/skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.mdView on GitHub Overview
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonest, not efficient. This skill enforces evidence-before-claims and requires running the full verification command, checking output and exit codes, before any success claim.
How This Skill Works
For every claim, identify the command that proves it, run the full verification command, read the complete output and exit status, and verify that the results support the claim. If verification fails or is inconclusive, report the actual state with evidence and only then make the claim.
When to Use It
- Before committing changes or creating a PR
- Before stating tests pass
- Before claiming a build succeeds
- Before declaring a bug is fixed
- Before moving to the next task or delegating to agents
Quick Start
- Step 1: Identify the verification command that proves the claim
- Step 2: Run the full command, read the output and exit status
- Step 3: If verification passes, state the claim with evidence; if not, report the actual state with the evidence
Best Practices
- Identify the exact verification command that proves the claim
- Run the full command freshly; avoid reusing cached results
- Read entire output, check exit codes, and tally failures
- Only claim success if verification output confirms it
- Share the verification evidence (command, output, and status) with the team
Example Use Cases
- OK: After running the unit tests command, exit code 0 and 0 failures, claim tests pass with evidence
- OK: After performing the full build, exit 0 and no errors, claim build succeeds with evidence
- OK: After re-running the bug symptom and it no longer reproduces, claim bug fixed with evidence
- OK: After running regression tests with red-green verification, claim regression test works with evidence
- OK: Agent reports success only after diff review and verification, not from the agent alone