niche-research-first-pass
Scannednpx machina-cli add skill kirillpolevoy/claude-saas-eval-skills/niche-research-first-pass --openclawNiche Research — First Pass (Lifestyle SaaS Lens)
Goal
Evaluate whether a niche can become a $1–3M ARR lifestyle business run solo or with 1 partner.
Ideal characteristics:
- Simple product scope (v1 in 2–6 weeks)
- Short sales cycle (< 30 days)
- Low support burden (< 5 hrs/week at scale)
- Concrete distribution (lists, channels, or high-intent inbound)
- Pricing that requires < 2,000 customers for $1M ARR
Voice
State conclusions first, evidence second. If distribution is unclear after research, output FAIL: Distribution unclear and stop. No hedging with "could potentially" or "might be worth exploring." If data is missing, say "Unknown—requires primary research."
Inputs
Only ask for missing inputs:
- Niche hypothesis (one sentence describing the market + problem)
- Geography (where to focus research—no default assumed)
- Buyer (if known)
Non-Negotiable Gate
A niche only passes if it has at least one concrete distribution surface:
| Distribution Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Clean buyer list | Directory, licensing board, registry, permit database |
| Channel partner | Supplier, distributor, association, insurer, payments provider |
| High-intent inbound | Compliance forms, deadline-driven searches, "how to file X" |
| System-of-record hook | Integration with existing workflow software |
If none exist after research: output FAIL (distribution) and stop.
Process
Execute in order. Stop early if distribution fails.
1. Define the Niche Precisely
- Who pays? Who uses daily?
- What mandatory artifact exists? (forms, submissions, certificates, logs, reports)
- What's the "money leak"? (lost renewals, rejected applications, admin hours, penalties, missed revenue)
2. Identify the Paperwork Wedge
- What exact document/packet/submission is unavoidable?
- What deadlines exist? (annual, quarterly, event-triggered)
- Who gets blamed when it's wrong or late?
3. Competitor & Crowding Check
- Direct niche tools (name, pricing, market position)
- Generic substitutes (PDFs, spreadsheets, Jobber, HubSpot, email)
- Government/industry portals acting as system-of-record
- Funded players in adjacent spaces
4. Distribution Map
Must be concrete—no "we could try LinkedIn."
- List sources (actual URLs or database names)
- 1–2 plausible channel partners
- Inbound keywords indicating urgency (with search volume if available)
- Integration hooks (what software do they already use?)
If unclear after research: FAIL: Distribution unclear. Cannot proceed.
5. Founder Fit Check
- Do you have natural access to these buyers? (former industry, network, geography)
- Would you enjoy 50+ sales calls with this persona?
- Is this a market you'd still care about in 3 years?
- Any ethical/personal hesitations?
Note: This section requires founder input. Flag if not provided.
6. Buildability & Support Load
- Can core v1 be built in 2–6 weeks by a solo dev?
- If regulated/integrated workflow: add 4–8 week buffer
- If jurisdiction sprawl (state-by-state rules): add research time per region
- Any liability or compliance certification required?
- Edge case density: low / medium / high
7. Pricing for Lifestyle Outcome
| Tier | ARPA | When Acceptable |
|---|---|---|
| Preferred | $150–$500/mo | Default target |
| Acceptable | $80–$150/mo | Only if churn < 3%/mo AND distribution is cheap |
| Avoid | < $50/mo | Only if distribution is nearly free (viral, marketplace) |
8. Revenue Quality
- Contract structure: monthly / annual / multi-year
- Payment behavior: prepaid / net-30 / invoice-heavy industries
- Expansion path: per-seat / usage-based / upsell tiers
9. Market Size (Conservative)
- Count payers using best available proxy (licenses, permits, businesses)
- Calculate path to $1M ARR: (target ARPA) × (customers needed)
- Calculate path to $3M ARR: (target ARPA) × (customers needed)
- Note key assumptions
10. Defensibility Check
At least one should be present:
- Data/workflow lock-in: Does usage create switching cost?
- Relationship moat: Are buyers sticky once onboarded?
- Distribution exclusivity: Can you lock up a channel?
- Speed moat: Can you ship fast enough to stay ahead?
11. Verdict + Kill Criteria
- Pursue: Clear distribution + viable pricing + buildable scope
- Hold: Promising but missing one key signal
- Kill: No distribution OR requires > 3,000 customers OR unbuildable scope
Include:
- Must-have signals to proceed
- 7-day validation plan
Output
Filename: Niche_FirstPass_<slug>.md
# Niche First Pass: <Title>
## TL;DR Verdict
- **Verdict:** Pursue / Hold / Kill
- **Why:** (3 blunt bullets)
## The Wedge
(One sentence: sellable workflow + mandatory artifact + outcome)
## Customer Profile
| Role | Description |
|------|-------------|
| Paying customer | |
| Daily user | |
| Trigger moment | |
## Workflow Today (As-Is)
1.
2.
3.
## Pain / Money Leak
- **Time waste:**
- **Errors/rejects:**
- **Compliance risk:**
- **Revenue leak:**
## Existing Solutions
### Direct Niche Tools
| Tool | Pricing | Notes |
|------|---------|-------|
| | | |
### Substitutes
-
## Distribution (Must Be Specific)
- **List source:** (actual URL/database)
- **Channel candidate:**
- **Inbound keywords:** (with volume if known)
- **Integration hook:**
- **Distribution risk:**
## Founder Fit
- [ ] Natural access to buyers
- [ ] Would enjoy 50+ sales calls with this persona
- [ ] Would care about this market in 3 years
- [ ] No ethical/personal hesitations
*Fit score: Strong / Moderate / Weak / Unknown*
## Buildability
| Factor | Assessment |
|--------|------------|
| Core v1 timeline | 2–6 weeks / 6–12 weeks / 12+ weeks |
| Regulatory buffer needed | Yes / No |
| Jurisdiction sprawl | None / Moderate / Severe |
| Edge case density | Low / Medium / High |
| Support load estimate | < 5 hrs/wk / 5–15 hrs/wk / 15+ hrs/wk |
### MVP Scope
**Must-have:**
-
**Nice-to-have:**
-
**Explicit non-goals:**
-
## Pricing
- **Recommended tiers:**
- **Expected ARPA:**
- **Why it's fair:**
## Revenue Quality
- **Contract structure:**
- **Payment behavior:**
- **Expansion path:**
## Market Size (Conservative)
- **Payers in target geography:**
- **Total US payers:**
- **Path to $1M ARR:** X customers × $Y ARPA
- **Path to $3M ARR:** X customers × $Y ARPA
- **Key assumption:**
## Defensibility
| Moat Type | Present? | Notes |
|-----------|----------|-------|
| Data/workflow lock-in | | |
| Relationship moat | | |
| Distribution exclusivity | | |
| Speed moat | | |
## Biggest Entry Risks
1.
2.
3.
## Kill Criteria
- If we don't hear X in 10 calls → kill
- If pricing won't clear $Y → kill
- If compliance/portal makes it redundant → kill
## 7-Day Validation Plan
| Day | Activity | Success Signal |
|-----|----------|----------------|
| 1 | | |
| 2–3 | | |
| 4–5 | | |
| 6–7 | | |
Source
git clone https://github.com/kirillpolevoy/claude-saas-eval-skills/blob/main/niche-research-first-pass/SKILL.mdView on GitHub Overview
Evaluates niche SaaS ideas through a lifestyle business lens targeting $1–3M ARR with solo or 1 partner. It uses a distribution-first methodology and requires a concrete go-to-market surface; ideas without clear GTM paths are killed early.
How This Skill Works
Follow a fixed sequence: 1) define the niche precisely (who pays, who uses daily, mandatory artifacts, money leak); 2) identify the paperwork wedge and deadlines; 3) run a competitor and crowding check; 4) build a concrete distribution map with real sources and 1–2 channel partners; 5) assess founder fit, buildability, and pricing for a lifestyle ARR target. The process stops early if distribution is unclear or no distribution surface exists (output FAIL).
When to Use It
- Evaluating a niche hypothesis or a first pass on an industry software idea.
- Researching a vertical software opportunity with a lifestyle lens (1–3M ARR).
- Validating whether a market is worth pursuing before deeper diligence.
- Responding to requests like 'evaluate this niche' or 'is this a good market'.
- Doing a quick screen to ensure there is a concrete distribution surface before deeper work.
Quick Start
- Step 1: Define the niche precisely (who pays, who uses daily, mandatory artifacts, money leak).
- Step 2: Identify the paperwork wedge and ensure there is a concrete distribution surface (URLs, channels, partners).
- Step 3: Assess buildability and pricing and confirm founder fit to decide whether to proceed.
Best Practices
- Start with a precise niche hypothesis (market + problem).
- Require a concrete distribution surface (URL, partner, or channel).
- Map 1–2 plausible channels and high-intent inbound keywords.
- Define v1 scope to ship in 2–6 weeks and a pricing plan under $500/mo.
- Document blockers, GTM assumptions, and go/no-go criteria.
Example Use Cases
- License and permit renewal automation for small healthcare providers in a single state.
- Credentialing and CE tracking for licensed professionals with automated reminders.
- Contractor license compliance management for SMB builders with portal submissions.
- Dental clinic insurance claim submission workflow automation.
- Vendor onboarding and compliance checks for SMB manufacturers.