Get the FREE Ultimate OpenClaw Setup Guide →

niche-research-first-pass

Scanned
npx machina-cli add skill kirillpolevoy/claude-saas-eval-skills/niche-research-first-pass --openclaw
Files (1)
SKILL.md
7.4 KB

Niche Research — First Pass (Lifestyle SaaS Lens)

Goal

Evaluate whether a niche can become a $1–3M ARR lifestyle business run solo or with 1 partner.

Ideal characteristics:

  • Simple product scope (v1 in 2–6 weeks)
  • Short sales cycle (< 30 days)
  • Low support burden (< 5 hrs/week at scale)
  • Concrete distribution (lists, channels, or high-intent inbound)
  • Pricing that requires < 2,000 customers for $1M ARR

Voice

State conclusions first, evidence second. If distribution is unclear after research, output FAIL: Distribution unclear and stop. No hedging with "could potentially" or "might be worth exploring." If data is missing, say "Unknown—requires primary research."

Inputs

Only ask for missing inputs:

  • Niche hypothesis (one sentence describing the market + problem)
  • Geography (where to focus research—no default assumed)
  • Buyer (if known)

Non-Negotiable Gate

A niche only passes if it has at least one concrete distribution surface:

Distribution TypeExample
Clean buyer listDirectory, licensing board, registry, permit database
Channel partnerSupplier, distributor, association, insurer, payments provider
High-intent inboundCompliance forms, deadline-driven searches, "how to file X"
System-of-record hookIntegration with existing workflow software

If none exist after research: output FAIL (distribution) and stop.

Process

Execute in order. Stop early if distribution fails.

1. Define the Niche Precisely

  • Who pays? Who uses daily?
  • What mandatory artifact exists? (forms, submissions, certificates, logs, reports)
  • What's the "money leak"? (lost renewals, rejected applications, admin hours, penalties, missed revenue)

2. Identify the Paperwork Wedge

  • What exact document/packet/submission is unavoidable?
  • What deadlines exist? (annual, quarterly, event-triggered)
  • Who gets blamed when it's wrong or late?

3. Competitor & Crowding Check

  • Direct niche tools (name, pricing, market position)
  • Generic substitutes (PDFs, spreadsheets, Jobber, HubSpot, email)
  • Government/industry portals acting as system-of-record
  • Funded players in adjacent spaces

4. Distribution Map

Must be concrete—no "we could try LinkedIn."

  • List sources (actual URLs or database names)
  • 1–2 plausible channel partners
  • Inbound keywords indicating urgency (with search volume if available)
  • Integration hooks (what software do they already use?)

If unclear after research: FAIL: Distribution unclear. Cannot proceed.

5. Founder Fit Check

  • Do you have natural access to these buyers? (former industry, network, geography)
  • Would you enjoy 50+ sales calls with this persona?
  • Is this a market you'd still care about in 3 years?
  • Any ethical/personal hesitations?

Note: This section requires founder input. Flag if not provided.

6. Buildability & Support Load

  • Can core v1 be built in 2–6 weeks by a solo dev?
  • If regulated/integrated workflow: add 4–8 week buffer
  • If jurisdiction sprawl (state-by-state rules): add research time per region
  • Any liability or compliance certification required?
  • Edge case density: low / medium / high

7. Pricing for Lifestyle Outcome

TierARPAWhen Acceptable
Preferred$150–$500/moDefault target
Acceptable$80–$150/moOnly if churn < 3%/mo AND distribution is cheap
Avoid< $50/moOnly if distribution is nearly free (viral, marketplace)

8. Revenue Quality

  • Contract structure: monthly / annual / multi-year
  • Payment behavior: prepaid / net-30 / invoice-heavy industries
  • Expansion path: per-seat / usage-based / upsell tiers

9. Market Size (Conservative)

  • Count payers using best available proxy (licenses, permits, businesses)
  • Calculate path to $1M ARR: (target ARPA) × (customers needed)
  • Calculate path to $3M ARR: (target ARPA) × (customers needed)
  • Note key assumptions

10. Defensibility Check

At least one should be present:

  • Data/workflow lock-in: Does usage create switching cost?
  • Relationship moat: Are buyers sticky once onboarded?
  • Distribution exclusivity: Can you lock up a channel?
  • Speed moat: Can you ship fast enough to stay ahead?

11. Verdict + Kill Criteria

  • Pursue: Clear distribution + viable pricing + buildable scope
  • Hold: Promising but missing one key signal
  • Kill: No distribution OR requires > 3,000 customers OR unbuildable scope

Include:

  • Must-have signals to proceed
  • 7-day validation plan

Output

Filename: Niche_FirstPass_<slug>.md

# Niche First Pass: <Title>

## TL;DR Verdict

- **Verdict:** Pursue / Hold / Kill
- **Why:** (3 blunt bullets)

## The Wedge

(One sentence: sellable workflow + mandatory artifact + outcome)

## Customer Profile

| Role | Description |
|------|-------------|
| Paying customer | |
| Daily user | |
| Trigger moment | |

## Workflow Today (As-Is)

1. 
2. 
3. 

## Pain / Money Leak

- **Time waste:**
- **Errors/rejects:**
- **Compliance risk:**
- **Revenue leak:**

## Existing Solutions

### Direct Niche Tools
| Tool | Pricing | Notes |
|------|---------|-------|
| | | |

### Substitutes
- 

## Distribution (Must Be Specific)

- **List source:** (actual URL/database)
- **Channel candidate:**
- **Inbound keywords:** (with volume if known)
- **Integration hook:**
- **Distribution risk:**

## Founder Fit

- [ ] Natural access to buyers
- [ ] Would enjoy 50+ sales calls with this persona
- [ ] Would care about this market in 3 years
- [ ] No ethical/personal hesitations

*Fit score: Strong / Moderate / Weak / Unknown*

## Buildability

| Factor | Assessment |
|--------|------------|
| Core v1 timeline | 2–6 weeks / 6–12 weeks / 12+ weeks |
| Regulatory buffer needed | Yes / No |
| Jurisdiction sprawl | None / Moderate / Severe |
| Edge case density | Low / Medium / High |
| Support load estimate | < 5 hrs/wk / 5–15 hrs/wk / 15+ hrs/wk |

### MVP Scope

**Must-have:**
- 

**Nice-to-have:**
- 

**Explicit non-goals:**
- 

## Pricing

- **Recommended tiers:**
- **Expected ARPA:**
- **Why it's fair:**

## Revenue Quality

- **Contract structure:**
- **Payment behavior:**
- **Expansion path:**

## Market Size (Conservative)

- **Payers in target geography:**
- **Total US payers:**
- **Path to $1M ARR:** X customers × $Y ARPA
- **Path to $3M ARR:** X customers × $Y ARPA
- **Key assumption:**

## Defensibility

| Moat Type | Present? | Notes |
|-----------|----------|-------|
| Data/workflow lock-in | | |
| Relationship moat | | |
| Distribution exclusivity | | |
| Speed moat | | |

## Biggest Entry Risks

1. 
2. 
3. 

## Kill Criteria

- If we don't hear X in 10 calls → kill
- If pricing won't clear $Y → kill
- If compliance/portal makes it redundant → kill

## 7-Day Validation Plan

| Day | Activity | Success Signal |
|-----|----------|----------------|
| 1 | | |
| 2–3 | | |
| 4–5 | | |
| 6–7 | | |

Source

git clone https://github.com/kirillpolevoy/claude-saas-eval-skills/blob/main/niche-research-first-pass/SKILL.mdView on GitHub

Overview

Evaluates niche SaaS ideas through a lifestyle business lens targeting $1–3M ARR with solo or 1 partner. It uses a distribution-first methodology and requires a concrete go-to-market surface; ideas without clear GTM paths are killed early.

How This Skill Works

Follow a fixed sequence: 1) define the niche precisely (who pays, who uses daily, mandatory artifacts, money leak); 2) identify the paperwork wedge and deadlines; 3) run a competitor and crowding check; 4) build a concrete distribution map with real sources and 1–2 channel partners; 5) assess founder fit, buildability, and pricing for a lifestyle ARR target. The process stops early if distribution is unclear or no distribution surface exists (output FAIL).

When to Use It

  • Evaluating a niche hypothesis or a first pass on an industry software idea.
  • Researching a vertical software opportunity with a lifestyle lens (1–3M ARR).
  • Validating whether a market is worth pursuing before deeper diligence.
  • Responding to requests like 'evaluate this niche' or 'is this a good market'.
  • Doing a quick screen to ensure there is a concrete distribution surface before deeper work.

Quick Start

  1. Step 1: Define the niche precisely (who pays, who uses daily, mandatory artifacts, money leak).
  2. Step 2: Identify the paperwork wedge and ensure there is a concrete distribution surface (URLs, channels, partners).
  3. Step 3: Assess buildability and pricing and confirm founder fit to decide whether to proceed.

Best Practices

  • Start with a precise niche hypothesis (market + problem).
  • Require a concrete distribution surface (URL, partner, or channel).
  • Map 1–2 plausible channels and high-intent inbound keywords.
  • Define v1 scope to ship in 2–6 weeks and a pricing plan under $500/mo.
  • Document blockers, GTM assumptions, and go/no-go criteria.

Example Use Cases

  • License and permit renewal automation for small healthcare providers in a single state.
  • Credentialing and CE tracking for licensed professionals with automated reminders.
  • Contractor license compliance management for SMB builders with portal submissions.
  • Dental clinic insurance claim submission workflow automation.
  • Vendor onboarding and compliance checks for SMB manufacturers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Add this skill to your agents
Sponsor this space

Reach thousands of developers