concise-planning
npx machina-cli add skill karim-bhalwani/agent-skills-collection/concise-planning --openclawFiles (1)
SKILL.md
3.3 KB
Concise Planning
Goal
Turn a user request into a single, actionable plan with atomic steps.
Workflow
1. Scan Context
- Read
README.md, docs, and relevant code files. - Identify constraints (language, frameworks, tests).
2. Minimal Interaction
- Ask at most 1–2 questions and only if truly blocking.
- Make reasonable assumptions for non-blocking unknowns.
3. Generate Plan
Use the following structure:
- Approach: 1-3 sentences on what and why.
- Scope: Bullet points for "In" and "Out".
- Action Items: A list of 6-10 atomic, ordered tasks (Verb-first).
- Validation: At least one item for testing.
Plan Template
# Plan
<High-level approach>
## Scope
- In:
- Out:
## Action Items
[ ] <Step 1: Discovery>
[ ] <Step 2: Implementation>
[ ] <Step 3: Implementation>
[ ] <Step 4: Validation/Testing>
[ ] <Step 5: Rollout/Commit>
## Open Questions
- <Question 1 (max 3)>
Checklist Guidelines
- Atomic: Each step should be a single logical unit of work.
- Verb-first: "Add...", "Refactor...", "Verify...".
- Concrete: Name specific files or modules when possible.
Outputs & Deliverables
- Primary Output: A single
plan.mdfollowing the Plan Template - Secondary Output: Open questions and assumptions list
- Success Criteria: Plan has atomic action items and at most 3 blocking questions
- Quality Gate: Plan reviewed and approved by requester or
implementer
Constraints
- Technical Constraints: Do not implement code in this step; produce a plan only.
- Scope Constraints: Plans should be limited to the requested scope; avoid speculative features.
- Governance Constraints: Align plan with
project-context.mdandspec.mdif present.
Common Pitfalls
- Over-Planning: Creating 30+ atomic steps when 6-10 suffice. Keep it concise; details emerge during execution.
- Vague Action Items: "Implement feature" isn't actionable. "Add payment processing to checkout flow" is specific.
- Missing Validation Steps: A plan without testing/verification sets up for rework. Always include a validation checkpoint.
- Ignoring Dependencies: Listing steps in random order instead of respecting precedence. Steps must be executable in sequence.
- Scope Creep: Including "nice-to-haves" in the main plan. Use "Out of Scope" section to acknowledge but exclude them.
- Assuming All Context: Not reading existing code/docs leads to redundant or conflicting plans. Always scan context first.
Integration Points
| Phase | Input From | Output To | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input | User request + context | Plan generation | Scan code, README, and constraints |
| Design Specs | architect specifications | Implementation steps | Use spec.md to guide atomic tasks |
| Execution | Approved plan | implementer | Hand off actionable checklist |
| Monitoring | Progress updates | Status tracking | Adjust if blockers emerge |
Source
git clone https://github.com/karim-bhalwani/agent-skills-collection/blob/main/skills/concise-planning/SKILL.mdView on GitHub Overview
Concise Planning turns a user request into a single, actionable plan with atomic steps. It minimizes interaction and makes reasonable assumptions to speed up implementation. Use it for creating implementation plans, breaking down tasks, or planning project workflows.
How This Skill Works
Scan the project context (README, docs, and relevant code) to surface constraints. Ask at most 1–2 clarifying questions if blockers remain. Generate a plan with: Approach (1–3 sentences), Scope (In/Out), Action Items (6–10 atomic, verb-first steps), and Validation. Items are concrete and executable; no code is produced in this step.
When to Use It
- You need a single, actionable plan distilled from a vague user request.
- You are breaking down a feature into concrete, executable steps.
- You require an atomic task checklist for coding tasks or modules.
- You’re planning project workflows with limited context or constraints.
- You want a plan aligned with existing constraints from project docs.
Quick Start
- Step 1: Scan the project context (docs, README, code) to identify constraints.
- Step 2: If blockers exist, ask up to 2 clarifying questions; otherwise proceed.
- Step 3: Output a plan.md following the Plan Template (Approach, Scope, Action Items, Validation).
Best Practices
- Scan README, docs, and code to identify constraints and edge cases.
- Ask at most 1–2 clarifying questions; avoid blocking the flow.
- Draft 6–10 atomic, verb-first action items with concrete targets.
- Name specific files, modules, or components when possible.
- Include at least one validation or testing item in the plan.
Example Use Cases
- Plan.md for a new REST API endpoint with endpoint, auth, and tests.
- Task checklist for refactoring an authentication module.
- Plan a rollout checklist for enabling a feature flag in production.
- Create a migration script implementation plan and rollback steps.
- Plan the CI/CD pipeline steps for a small service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Add this skill to your agents