obra-verification-before-completion
Scannednpx machina-cli add skill faulkdev/github-copilot-superpowers/obra-verification-before-completion --openclawVerification Before Completion
Overview
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.
Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.
Copilot Completion Checklist
✅ Requirements
- Re-state what “done” means (from the user request).
- Confirm each requirement is satisfied (link to files/lines if possible).
✅ Correctness
- Consider edge cases (inputs, nulls, errors).
- Add regression tests when fixing bugs.
✅ Quality
- Lint/format follows project rules.
- No debug prints/logs left behind unless requested.
- Minimal diff; clear naming.
✅ Verification commands (choose what fits repo)
- Tests:
… - Lint:
… - Build:
… - Typecheck:
…
❌ No fabricated verification
- If you can’t run commands, provide them and state you didn’t execute them.
The Iron Law
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
The Gate Function
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
Common Failures
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|---|---|---|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
Red Flags - STOP
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- ANY wording implying success without having run verification
Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
Key Patterns
Tests:
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
Build:
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
Requirements:
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
Agent delegation:
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
Why This Matters
From 24 failure memories:
- your human partner said "I don't believe you" - trust broken
- Undefined functions shipped - would crash
- Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features
- Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework
- Violates: "Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced."
When To Apply
ALWAYS before:
- ANY variation of success/completion claims
- ANY expression of satisfaction
- ANY positive statement about work state
- Committing, PR creation, task completion
- Moving to next task
- Delegating to agents
Rule applies to:
- Exact phrases
- Paraphrases and synonyms
- Implications of success
- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness
The Bottom Line
No shortcuts for verification.
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.
Source
git clone https://github.com/faulkdev/github-copilot-superpowers/blob/integrate-obra-superpowers/scripts/overrides/obra/obra-verification-before-completion/SKILL.mdView on GitHub Overview
This skill enforces evidence-based claims before finalizing answers or PRs in VS Code Copilot Agent mode. It stresses running verification commands and citing fresh outputs, not declaring done without proof. It provides a gate function, common failure patterns, and practical steps to ensure verifiable completion.
How This Skill Works
It uses a structured checklist (Requirements, Correctness, Quality) and enforces 'No completion claims without fresh verification evidence.' The Gate Function guides you to identify the proving command, run it fully, read and interpret the output, and only then claim success with evidence.
When to Use It
- Before finalizing an answer or PR in Copilot Agent mode
- When claiming tests, lint, or build passed
- When reporting agent success or completion in a review
- Before merging a PR or closing a task
- If you cannot run verification commands, state it and provide commands and outputs instead
Quick Start
- Step 1: IDENTIFY the verification command that proves the claim (e.g., tests, lint, build)
- Step 2: RUN the FULL command and capture fresh output in this repository context
- Step 3: READ the output, VERIFY the claim against evidence, and only then state the status
Best Practices
- Re-state what 'done' means from the user request and verify each item
- Confirm each requirement is satisfied, linking to files/lines when possible
- Run full verification commands: Tests, Lint, Build, Typecheck
- Read full command outputs and ensure exit codes indicate success
- Only claim success when you have fresh evidence and report it
Example Use Cases
- A PR is labeled 'done' only after fresh test, lint, and build outputs show all green with exact command results
- A verification log links results (e.g., test suite 0 failures, 0 errors) before approving a merge
- No debug prints or stray logs remain; the commit includes evidence of verification
- An agent reports success only after VCS diff confirms the expected changes
- Rationale is documented: if verification couldn't be run, commands are provided with outputs or explanation