Get the FREE Ultimate OpenClaw Setup Guide →

diligence-risk-burndown

npx machina-cli add skill evalops/open-associate-skills/diligence-risk-burndown --openclaw
Files (1)
SKILL.md
5.7 KB

Diligence risk burn-down

When to use

Use this skill when:

  • A company is past first meeting and needs structured diligence
  • You need to answer "what could kill this?" quickly
  • You need customer, product, GTM, and team evidence for an IC memo

Inputs you should request (only if missing)

  • Stage + round dynamics (lead? follow? timeline?)
  • A draft "must be true" list from the first meeting
  • Access to customer references (including churned / lost deals if possible)
  • Data room or key docs (deck, pipeline, financial model, product docs)

Outputs you must produce

  1. Ranked risk register (MAX 4 RISKS - force prioritization)
  2. Diligence plan (one fastest test per risk, time-boxed)
  3. Evidence pack (notes + quotes + data)
  4. Anti-confirmation evidence (required: churned customer or lost deal call, competitor validation)
  5. Go/No-go recommendation with rationale

Templates:

  • assets/risk-register.md
  • assets/diligence-plan.md
  • assets/customer-call-script.md
  • assets/product-eval-checklist.md

Hard rules

Max 4 risks (non-negotiable)

  • If you have more than 4 risks, you haven't prioritized.
  • The discipline is choosing: what are the 4 things that would actually kill this deal?
  • Other concerns go in "watch list" but don't get active diligence time.

One fastest test per risk

  • For each risk, define the single fastest test that generates decision-changing evidence.
  • "More research" is not a test. A test has a clear pass/fail outcome.
  • Examples of fast tests:
    • 1 buyer call with a specific question
    • Pipeline inspection: stage aging, sources, cycle time
    • Hands-on product evaluation with a "blank sheet" re-explain test
    • Churned / lost prospect reference call

Time-box per test

  • Every test must have a deadline (hours or days, not weeks).
  • If you can't complete the test in the time-box, the risk is either not testable or you need a different test.

Evidence standard

  • For each risk, write: "What evidence would convince us this risk is manageable?"
  • And: "What evidence would kill the deal?"
  • Be specific. "Good retention" is not an evidence standard. "Net retention >110% with cohort data" is.

Procedure

1) Build the ranked risk register (MAX 4)

List risks in these buckets (pick the 4 that matter most):

  • Market risk
  • Product risk
  • GTM risk
  • Team risk
  • Competitive/moat risk
  • Deal/term risk (if relevant)

Rank by: decision impact x uncertainty.

Hard rule: If you can't name the top 4 ways this fails, you aren't diligencing yet.

2) Define the fastest falsification test for each risk

For each of the 4 risks, write:

RiskEvidence that increases convictionEvidence that killsFastest testTime-boxOwner
1.hours/days
2.hours/days
3.hours/days
4.hours/days

3) Run anti-confirmation diligence (REQUIRED)

At least one churned customer or lost deal call:

  • If the company has churned customers, you must talk to one.
  • If no churn yet, talk to a lost deal (prospect who didn't buy).
  • If neither exists, document why and discount retention claims heavily.

At least one competitor/alternative validation:

  • Talk to someone using a competitor or the "do nothing" alternative.
  • Understand: why didn't they choose this company? What would change their mind?
  • If you can't do this, explain why it's impossible and document the gap.

4) Run customer diligence (buyers first)

Do at least:

  • 3 buyer calls (people who sign)
  • 2 user calls (people who use daily)
  • 1 "failed" call (lost deal, churn, or disqualified) - REQUIRED

On calls, capture:

  • Trigger event
  • Alternatives considered
  • What would make them churn
  • Expansion path and constraints
  • Procurement/security blockers

5) Product diligence (can it survive reality?)

  • Request a live demo, then ask the founder to re-explain from scratch.
  • Ask for 2-3 hard examples where the product broke and how they fixed it.
  • Identify integration points and estimate real deployment cost.

6) GTM diligence (repeatability)

  • Validate ICP specificity (not "mid-market enterprises").
  • Validate cycle time and onboarding (time-to-value).
  • Validate pricing logic and unit economics by segment.

7) Team diligence (learning rate + decision rights)

  • Look for:
    • ability to change mind with evidence
    • clear ownership of GTM/product/eng
    • healthy conflict resolution

8) Competitive diligence (why incumbents don't win)

  • Identify:
    • direct competitors
    • incumbent "good enough" substitutes
    • internal build threat

Ask: "If an incumbent shipped a V1 in 6 months, what still makes you win?"

Salesforce logging (recommended)

  • Ensure an Opportunity exists with a "Diligence" stage.
  • Log each reference call as an Activity and tag it (buyer/user/churn/lost-deal).
  • Create Tasks for diligence workstreams with owners and due dates.
  • Attach/record the risk register + evidence pack (as Notes or Files).

Use salesforce-crm-ops if you need API patterns.

Edge cases

  • If the process is rushed: focus only on top 2 risks and explicitly document what you did not validate.
  • If references are all friendly: insist on at least one "failed" reference; otherwise discount the signal.
  • If you can't get anti-confirmation evidence: document this as a major gap and flag it in the memo.

Source

git clone https://github.com/evalops/open-associate-skills/blob/main/diligence-risk-burndown/SKILL.mdView on GitHub

Overview

Run diligence as a fast risk burn-down: build a ranked risk register (max 4), execute the fastest tests, and assemble decision-changing evidence. This approach surfaces critical risks quickly when a deal advances past the first meeting, informing a clear go/no-go decision.

How This Skill Works

Start by building a ranked risk register with up to 4 risks across buckets like Market, Product, GTM, Team, Competitive/moat, and Deal/Term, ordered by decision impact and uncertainty. For each risk, define the single fastest falsification test with a clear pass/fail outcome and a strict time-box. Then run anti-confirmation diligence (at least one churned/lost-deal reference and one competitor validation) alongside customer diligence (3 buyer calls and 2 user calls) to gather notes, quotes, and data, culminating in a Go/No-go recommendation with rationale.

When to Use It

  • A company is past the first meeting and needs structured diligence
  • You need to quickly answer what could kill the deal
  • You require evidence across customer, product, GTM, and team for an IC memo
  • There are multiple potential showstoppers and you must prioritize the top 4 risks
  • You want a defensible go/no-go decision based on concrete tests and evidence

Quick Start

  1. Step 1: Build a ranked risk register with up to 4 risks across the buckets and prioritize by impact and uncertainty
  2. Step 2: For each risk, define the single fastest falsification test with a clear pass/fail and a strict time-box; assign owners
  3. Step 3: Run anti-confirmation diligence (churned/lost reference plus competitor validation) and perform customer diligence (3 buyer calls, 2 user calls), then produce the Go/No-go with rationale

Best Practices

  • Limit the risk register to 4 risks; anything else goes to a watch list and is not actively diligenced
  • Define the single fastest test per risk with a clear pass/fail outcome
  • Time-box every test with explicit deadlines; if you can't complete in time, choose a different test
  • For each risk specify both evidence that would convince it is manageable and evidence that would kill the deal
  • Use the provided templates (assets/risk-register.md, assets/diligence-plan.md, assets/customer-call-script.md, assets/product-eval-checklist.md) to standardize outputs

Example Use Cases

  • Enterprise SaaS diligence after a first meeting focuses on four risks (Market, Product, GTM, Team) with fastest tests including 1 buyer call, pipeline aging check, blank-sheet product eval, and a reference call; evidence pack compiled and a go/no-go decision produced
  • Churn risk identified early; anti-confirmation relies on a churned customer reference call and a competitor validation to test alternatives
  • Competitive/do-nothing risk surfaced; fastest test is talking to users of a competitor solution to understand why they chose it
  • Deal/term risk flagged; fastest test is a rapid legal/term skim for constraints and deal-breakers with a time-boxed review
  • Initial product-market-fit concerns validated through 3 buyer calls focused on must-have features and 2 user calls to confirm usability

Frequently Asked Questions

Add this skill to your agents
Sponsor this space

Reach thousands of developers