Get the FREE Ultimate OpenClaw Setup Guide →

verification-before-completion

Scanned
npx machina-cli add skill ed3dai/ed3d-plugins/verification-before-completion --openclaw
Files (1)
SKILL.md
4.1 KB

Verification Before Completion

Overview

Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.

Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.

Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.

The Iron Law

NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE

If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

The Gate Function

BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
   - If NO: State actual status with evidence
   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying

Common Failures

ClaimRequiresNot Sufficient
Tests passTest command output: 0 failuresPrevious run, "should pass"
Linter cleanLinter output: 0 errorsPartial check, extrapolation
Build succeedsBuild command: exit 0Linter passing, logs look good
Bug fixedTest original symptom: passesCode changed, assumed fixed
Regression test worksRed-green cycle verifiedTest passes once
Agent completedVCS diff shows changesAgent reports "success"
Requirements metLine-by-line checklistTests passing

Red Flags - STOP

  • Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
  • Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
  • About to commit/push/PR without verification
  • Trusting agent success reports
  • Relying on partial verification
  • Thinking "just this once"
  • Tired and wanting work over
  • ANY wording implying success without having run verification

Rationalization Prevention

ExcuseReality
"Should work now"RUN the verification
"I'm confident"Confidence ≠ evidence
"Just this once"No exceptions
"Linter passed"Linter ≠ compiler
"Agent said success"Verify independently
"I'm tired"Exhaustion ≠ excuse
"Partial check is enough"Partial proves nothing
"Different words so rule doesn't apply"Spirit over letter

Key Patterns

Tests:

✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"

Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):

✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)

Build:

✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)

Requirements:

✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"

Agent delegation:

✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report

Why This Matters

From 24 failure memories:

  • your human partner said "I don't believe you" - trust broken
  • Undefined functions shipped - would crash
  • Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features
  • Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework
  • Violates: "Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced."

When To Apply

ALWAYS before:

  • ANY variation of success/completion claims
  • ANY expression of satisfaction
  • ANY positive statement about work state
  • Committing, PR creation, task completion
  • Moving to next task
  • Delegating to agents

Rule applies to:

  • Exact phrases
  • Paraphrases and synonyms
  • Implications of success
  • ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness

The Bottom Line

No shortcuts for verification.

Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.

This is non-negotiable.

Source

git clone https://github.com/ed3dai/ed3d-plugins/blob/main/plugins/ed3d-plan-and-execute/skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.mdView on GitHub

Overview

This skill enforces honesty by requiring fresh verification before claiming work is complete. It mandates running the full verification command, inspecting the output, and only making success claims when evidence supports them.

How This Skill Works

Follow the Iron Law: no completion claims without fresh verification evidence. Use the Gate Function: identify the proving command, run it fully, read the complete output, verify the claim, and only then state success. Skipping steps equates to lying; always attach concrete evidence to any claim.

When to Use It

  • Before committing changes that claim success (e.g., tests pass, build succeeds).
  • Before creating a pull request or marking a task as done.
  • When validating a fix or feature by running the exact verification commands and confirming fresh results.
  • When relying on agent or automated reports—verify them against fresh command outputs.
  • Before moving to the next task or delegating work based on a completed state.

Quick Start

  1. Step 1: Identify the exact verification command that proves the claim.
  2. Step 2: Run the full command in a fresh environment and capture stdout, stderr, and exit code.
  3. Step 3: Read the output, verify against the claim, and only then state success with evidence.

Best Practices

  • Always run the full verification command in a fresh environment.
  • Read the entire output: exit codes, failure counts, and detailed messages.
  • Only claim success if the output confirms the claim with explicit evidence.
  • Document the exact command used and attach the verification output with the claim.
  • Do not rely on previous runs or assumptions; verification is mandatory before any success statement.

Example Use Cases

  • Run the test suite in a clean environment; if the output shows 0 failures and exit code 0, claim 'tests pass' with the log as evidence.
  • Run the linter and build commands; if both exit cleanly (exit 0) with no errors, state 'build and lint pass' and attach the outputs.
  • Re-run the original bug reproducer after changes; if the repro no longer reproduces and the test passes, claim the bug is fixed with evidence.
  • Execute a regression test cycle (red → green) to verify the fix; only claim success after the green run is observed.
  • If an agent reports success, first verify by running the relevant commands locally and comparing VCS diffs to confirm the actual state.

Frequently Asked Questions

Add this skill to your agents
Sponsor this space

Reach thousands of developers