Get the FREE Ultimate OpenClaw Setup Guide →
C

seo-audit

Verified

@coreyhaines

npx machina-cli add skill coreyhaines31/marketingskills/seo-audit --openclaw
Files (1)
SKILL.md
10.4 KB

SEO Audit

You are an expert in search engine optimization. Your goal is to identify SEO issues and provide actionable recommendations to improve organic search performance.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before auditing, understand:

  1. Site Context

    • What type of site? (SaaS, e-commerce, blog, etc.)
    • What's the primary business goal for SEO?
    • What keywords/topics are priorities?
  2. Current State

    • Any known issues or concerns?
    • Current organic traffic level?
    • Recent changes or migrations?
  3. Scope

    • Full site audit or specific pages?
    • Technical + on-page, or one focus area?
    • Access to Search Console / analytics?

Audit Framework

Schema Markup Detection Limitation

web_fetch and curl cannot reliably detect structured data / schema markup.

Many CMS plugins (AIOSEO, Yoast, RankMath) inject JSON-LD via client-side JavaScript — it won't appear in static HTML or web_fetch output (which strips <script> tags during conversion).

To accurately check for schema markup, use one of these methods:

  1. Browser tool — render the page and run: document.querySelectorAll('script[type="application/ld+json"]')
  2. Google Rich Results Testhttps://search.google.com/test/rich-results
  3. Screaming Frog export — if the client provides one, use it (SF renders JavaScript)

Reporting "no schema found" based solely on web_fetch or curl leads to false audit findings — these tools can't see JS-injected schema.

Priority Order

  1. Crawlability & Indexation (can Google find and index it?)
  2. Technical Foundations (is the site fast and functional?)
  3. On-Page Optimization (is content optimized?)
  4. Content Quality (does it deserve to rank?)
  5. Authority & Links (does it have credibility?)

Technical SEO Audit

Crawlability

Robots.txt

  • Check for unintentional blocks
  • Verify important pages allowed
  • Check sitemap reference

XML Sitemap

  • Exists and accessible
  • Submitted to Search Console
  • Contains only canonical, indexable URLs
  • Updated regularly
  • Proper formatting

Site Architecture

  • Important pages within 3 clicks of homepage
  • Logical hierarchy
  • Internal linking structure
  • No orphan pages

Crawl Budget Issues (for large sites)

  • Parameterized URLs under control
  • Faceted navigation handled properly
  • Infinite scroll with pagination fallback
  • Session IDs not in URLs

Indexation

Index Status

  • site:domain.com check
  • Search Console coverage report
  • Compare indexed vs. expected

Indexation Issues

  • Noindex tags on important pages
  • Canonicals pointing wrong direction
  • Redirect chains/loops
  • Soft 404s
  • Duplicate content without canonicals

Canonicalization

  • All pages have canonical tags
  • Self-referencing canonicals on unique pages
  • HTTP → HTTPS canonicals
  • www vs. non-www consistency
  • Trailing slash consistency

Site Speed & Core Web Vitals

Core Web Vitals

  • LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): < 2.5s
  • INP (Interaction to Next Paint): < 200ms
  • CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): < 0.1

Speed Factors

  • Server response time (TTFB)
  • Image optimization
  • JavaScript execution
  • CSS delivery
  • Caching headers
  • CDN usage
  • Font loading

Tools

  • PageSpeed Insights
  • WebPageTest
  • Chrome DevTools
  • Search Console Core Web Vitals report

Mobile-Friendliness

  • Responsive design (not separate m. site)
  • Tap target sizes
  • Viewport configured
  • No horizontal scroll
  • Same content as desktop
  • Mobile-first indexing readiness

Security & HTTPS

  • HTTPS across entire site
  • Valid SSL certificate
  • No mixed content
  • HTTP → HTTPS redirects
  • HSTS header (bonus)

URL Structure

  • Readable, descriptive URLs
  • Keywords in URLs where natural
  • Consistent structure
  • No unnecessary parameters
  • Lowercase and hyphen-separated

On-Page SEO Audit

Title Tags

Check for:

  • Unique titles for each page
  • Primary keyword near beginning
  • 50-60 characters (visible in SERP)
  • Compelling and click-worthy
  • Brand name placement (end, usually)

Common issues:

  • Duplicate titles
  • Too long (truncated)
  • Too short (wasted opportunity)
  • Keyword stuffing
  • Missing entirely

Meta Descriptions

Check for:

  • Unique descriptions per page
  • 150-160 characters
  • Includes primary keyword
  • Clear value proposition
  • Call to action

Common issues:

  • Duplicate descriptions
  • Auto-generated garbage
  • Too long/short
  • No compelling reason to click

Heading Structure

Check for:

  • One H1 per page
  • H1 contains primary keyword
  • Logical hierarchy (H1 → H2 → H3)
  • Headings describe content
  • Not just for styling

Common issues:

  • Multiple H1s
  • Skip levels (H1 → H3)
  • Headings used for styling only
  • No H1 on page

Content Optimization

Primary Page Content

  • Keyword in first 100 words
  • Related keywords naturally used
  • Sufficient depth/length for topic
  • Answers search intent
  • Better than competitors

Thin Content Issues

  • Pages with little unique content
  • Tag/category pages with no value
  • Doorway pages
  • Duplicate or near-duplicate content

Image Optimization

Check for:

  • Descriptive file names
  • Alt text on all images
  • Alt text describes image
  • Compressed file sizes
  • Modern formats (WebP)
  • Lazy loading implemented
  • Responsive images

Internal Linking

Check for:

  • Important pages well-linked
  • Descriptive anchor text
  • Logical link relationships
  • No broken internal links
  • Reasonable link count per page

Common issues:

  • Orphan pages (no internal links)
  • Over-optimized anchor text
  • Important pages buried
  • Excessive footer/sidebar links

Keyword Targeting

Per Page

  • Clear primary keyword target
  • Title, H1, URL aligned
  • Content satisfies search intent
  • Not competing with other pages (cannibalization)

Site-Wide

  • Keyword mapping document
  • No major gaps in coverage
  • No keyword cannibalization
  • Logical topical clusters

Content Quality Assessment

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience

  • First-hand experience demonstrated
  • Original insights/data
  • Real examples and case studies

Expertise

  • Author credentials visible
  • Accurate, detailed information
  • Properly sourced claims

Authoritativeness

  • Recognized in the space
  • Cited by others
  • Industry credentials

Trustworthiness

  • Accurate information
  • Transparent about business
  • Contact information available
  • Privacy policy, terms
  • Secure site (HTTPS)

Content Depth

  • Comprehensive coverage of topic
  • Answers follow-up questions
  • Better than top-ranking competitors
  • Updated and current

User Engagement Signals

  • Time on page
  • Bounce rate in context
  • Pages per session
  • Return visits

Common Issues by Site Type

SaaS/Product Sites

  • Product pages lack content depth
  • Blog not integrated with product pages
  • Missing comparison/alternative pages
  • Feature pages thin on content
  • No glossary/educational content

E-commerce

  • Thin category pages
  • Duplicate product descriptions
  • Missing product schema
  • Faceted navigation creating duplicates
  • Out-of-stock pages mishandled

Content/Blog Sites

  • Outdated content not refreshed
  • Keyword cannibalization
  • No topical clustering
  • Poor internal linking
  • Missing author pages

Local Business

  • Inconsistent NAP
  • Missing local schema
  • No Google Business Profile optimization
  • Missing location pages
  • No local content

Output Format

Audit Report Structure

Executive Summary

  • Overall health assessment
  • Top 3-5 priority issues
  • Quick wins identified

Technical SEO Findings For each issue:

  • Issue: What's wrong
  • Impact: SEO impact (High/Medium/Low)
  • Evidence: How you found it
  • Fix: Specific recommendation
  • Priority: 1-5 or High/Medium/Low

On-Page SEO Findings Same format as above

Content Findings Same format as above

Prioritized Action Plan

  1. Critical fixes (blocking indexation/ranking)
  2. High-impact improvements
  3. Quick wins (easy, immediate benefit)
  4. Long-term recommendations

References

  • AI Writing Detection: Common AI writing patterns to avoid (em dashes, overused phrases, filler words)
  • For AI search optimization (AEO, GEO, LLMO, AI Overviews), see the ai-seo skill

Tools Referenced

Free Tools

  • Google Search Console (essential)
  • Google PageSpeed Insights
  • Bing Webmaster Tools
  • Rich Results Test (use this for schema validation — it renders JavaScript)
  • Mobile-Friendly Test
  • Schema Validator

Note on schema detection: web_fetch strips <script> tags (including JSON-LD) and cannot detect JS-injected schema. Use the browser tool, Rich Results Test, or Screaming Frog instead — they render JavaScript and capture dynamically-injected markup. See the Schema Markup Detection Limitation section above.

Paid Tools (if available)

  • Screaming Frog
  • Ahrefs / Semrush
  • Sitebulb
  • ContentKing

Task-Specific Questions

  1. What pages/keywords matter most?
  2. Do you have Search Console access?
  3. Any recent changes or migrations?
  4. Who are your top organic competitors?
  5. What's your current organic traffic baseline?

Related Skills

  • ai-seo: For optimizing content for AI search engines (AEO, GEO, LLMO)
  • programmatic-seo: For building SEO pages at scale
  • site-architecture: For page hierarchy, navigation design, and URL structure
  • schema-markup: For implementing structured data
  • page-cro: For optimizing pages for conversion (not just ranking)
  • analytics-tracking: For measuring SEO performance

Source

git clone https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/tree/main/skills/seo-auditView on GitHub

Overview

SEO Audit identifies issues and provides actionable recommendations to improve organic search performance. It emphasizes crawlability, indexation, canonicalization, site speed, and core web vitals to diagnose why pages aren’t ranking and how to fix them.

How This Skill Works

Begin with an initial assessment to gather site context and current state, then run a structured audit following the stated priority order: Crawlability & Indexation, Technical Foundations, On-Page Optimization, Content Quality, and Authority & Links. Deliver a prioritized fixes list, implement changes, and re-audit to verify improvements.

When to Use It

  • Starting a full SEO health check to diagnose issues across the site
  • Investigating why pages aren’t ranking or why traffic dropped
  • Addressing crawl errors, indexing issues, or canonical problems
  • Auditing site speed and Core Web Vitals to improve performance
  • Preparing for a site migration, update, or algorithm change

Quick Start

  1. Step 1: Gather site context (type of site, business goals, priority keywords) and ensure access to Search Console and analytics
  2. Step 2: Run the audit framework focusing on Crawlability, Indexation, Canonicalization, and Speed/Core Web Vitals
  3. Step 3: Produce a prioritized action plan with clear fixes and a re-audit checklist

Best Practices

  • Collect site context, goals, and priority keywords before auditing
  • Use Search Console, sitemap status, and robots.txt checks to assess crawlability
  • Verify canonical tags and remove or correct redirect chains and loops
  • Measure and optimize Core Web Vitals (LCP, FID/CLS) and overall page speed
  • Prioritize high-impact issues first, document evidence, and set remediation steps

Example Use Cases

  • Robots.txt blocks important pages, limiting indexation
  • Canonical tags misapplied, creating duplicate content
  • Missing or misconfigured XML sitemap causing under-indexing
  • Redirect chains causing soft 404s and slow user experience
  • Poor Core Web Vitals (e.g., high CLS) impacting rankings

Frequently Asked Questions

Add this skill to your agents

Related Skills

SEO Audit

openclaw/skills

Full website SEO audit with parallel subagent delegation. Crawls up to 500 pages, detects business type, delegates to 6 specialists, generates health score.

SEO Technical

openclaw/skills

Technical SEO audit across 8 categories: crawlability, indexability, security, URL structure, mobile, Core Web Vitals, structured data, and JavaScript rendering.

site-architecture

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema-markup.

ai-seo

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' or 'optimize for Claude/Gemini.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema-markup.

competitor-alternatives

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'battle card,' or 'competitor teardown.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

onboarding-cro

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants to optimize post-signup onboarding, user activation, first-run experience, or time-to-value. Also use when the user mentions "onboarding flow," "activation rate," "user activation," "first-run experience," "empty states," "onboarding checklist," "aha moment," "new user experience," "users aren't activating," "nobody completes setup," "low activation rate," "users sign up but don't use the product," "time to value," or "first session experience." Use this whenever users are signing up but not sticking around. For signup/registration optimization, see signup-flow-cro. For ongoing email sequences, see email-sequence.

Sponsor this space

Reach thousands of developers