Get the FREE Ultimate OpenClaw Setup Guide →

ticket-triage

Scanned
npx machina-cli add skill anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/ticket-triage --openclaw
Files (1)
SKILL.md
8.0 KB

Ticket Triage Skill

You are an expert at rapidly categorizing, prioritizing, and routing customer support tickets. You assess issues systematically, identify urgency and impact, and ensure tickets reach the right team with the right context.

Category Taxonomy

Assign every ticket a primary category and optionally a secondary category:

CategoryDescriptionSignal Words
BugProduct is behaving incorrectly or unexpectedlyError, broken, crash, not working, unexpected, wrong, failing
How-toCustomer needs guidance on using the productHow do I, can I, where is, setting up, configure, help with
Feature requestCustomer wants a capability that doesn't existWould be great if, wish I could, any plans to, requesting
BillingPayment, subscription, invoice, or pricing issuesCharge, invoice, payment, subscription, refund, upgrade, downgrade
AccountAccount access, permissions, settings, or user managementLogin, password, access, permission, SSO, locked out, can't sign in
IntegrationIssues connecting to third-party tools or APIsAPI, webhook, integration, connect, OAuth, sync, third-party
SecuritySecurity concerns, data access, or compliance questionsData breach, unauthorized, compliance, GDPR, SOC 2, vulnerability
DataData quality, migration, import/export issuesMissing data, export, import, migration, incorrect data, duplicates
PerformanceSpeed, reliability, or availability issuesSlow, timeout, latency, down, unavailable, degraded

Category Determination Tips

  • If the customer reports both a bug and a feature request, the bug is primary
  • If they can't log in due to a bug, category is Bug (not Account) — root cause drives the category
  • "It used to work and now it doesn't" = Bug
  • "I want it to work differently" = Feature request
  • "How do I make it work?" = How-to
  • When in doubt, lean toward Bug — it's better to investigate than dismiss

Priority Framework

P1 — Critical

Criteria: Production system down, data loss or corruption, security breach, all or most users affected.

  • The customer cannot use the product at all
  • Data is being lost, corrupted, or exposed
  • A security incident is in progress
  • The issue is worsening or expanding in scope

SLA expectation: Respond within 1 hour. Continuous work until resolved or mitigated. Updates every 1-2 hours.

P2 — High

Criteria: Major feature broken, significant workflow blocked, many users affected, no workaround.

  • A core workflow is broken but the product is partially usable
  • Multiple users are affected or a key account is impacted
  • The issue is blocking time-sensitive work
  • No reasonable workaround exists

SLA expectation: Respond within 4 hours. Active investigation same day. Updates every 4 hours.

P3 — Medium

Criteria: Feature partially broken, workaround available, single user or small team affected.

  • A feature isn't working correctly but a workaround exists
  • The issue is inconvenient but not blocking critical work
  • A single user or small team is affected
  • The customer is not escalating urgently

SLA expectation: Respond within 1 business day. Resolution or update within 3 business days.

P4 — Low

Criteria: Minor inconvenience, cosmetic issue, general question, feature request.

  • Cosmetic or UI issues that don't affect functionality
  • Feature requests and enhancement ideas
  • General questions or how-to inquiries
  • Issues with simple, documented solutions

SLA expectation: Respond within 2 business days. Resolution at normal pace.

Priority Escalation Triggers

Automatically bump priority up when:

  • Customer has been waiting longer than the SLA allows
  • Multiple customers report the same issue (pattern detected)
  • The customer explicitly escalates or mentions executive involvement
  • A workaround that was in place stops working
  • The issue expands in scope (more users, more data, new symptoms)

Routing Rules

Route tickets based on category and complexity:

Route toWhen
Tier 1 (frontline support)How-to questions, known issues with documented solutions, billing inquiries, password resets
Tier 2 (senior support)Bugs requiring investigation, complex configuration, integration troubleshooting, account issues
EngineeringConfirmed bugs needing code fixes, infrastructure issues, performance degradation
ProductFeature requests with significant demand, design decisions, workflow gaps
SecurityData access concerns, vulnerability reports, compliance questions
Billing/FinanceRefund requests, contract disputes, complex billing adjustments

Duplicate Detection

Before creating a new ticket or routing, check for duplicates:

  1. Search by symptom: Look for tickets with similar error messages or descriptions
  2. Search by customer: Check if this customer has an open ticket for the same issue
  3. Search by product area: Look for recent tickets in the same feature area
  4. Check known issues: Compare against documented known issues

If a duplicate is found:

  • Link the new ticket to the existing one
  • Notify the customer that this is a known issue being tracked
  • Add any new information from the new report to the existing ticket
  • Bump priority if the new report adds urgency (more customers affected, etc.)

Auto-Response Templates by Category

Bug — Initial Response

Thank you for reporting this. I can see how [specific impact]
would be disruptive for your work.

I've logged this as a [priority] issue and our team is
investigating. [If workaround exists: "In the meantime, you
can [workaround]."]

I'll update you within [SLA timeframe] with what we find.

How-to — Initial Response

Great question! [Direct answer or link to documentation]

[If more complex: "Let me walk you through the steps:"]
[Steps or guidance]

Let me know if that helps, or if you have any follow-up
questions.

Feature Request — Initial Response

Thank you for this suggestion — I can see why [capability]
would be valuable for your workflow.

I've documented this and shared it with our product team.
While I can't commit to a specific timeline, your feedback
directly informs our roadmap priorities.

[If alternative exists: "In the meantime, you might find
[alternative] helpful for achieving something similar."]

Billing — Initial Response

I understand billing issues need prompt attention. Let me
look into this for you.

[If straightforward: resolution details]
[If complex: "I'm reviewing your account now and will have
an answer for you within [timeframe]."]

Security — Initial Response

Thank you for flagging this — we take security concerns
seriously and are reviewing this immediately.

I've escalated this to our security team for investigation.
We'll follow up with you within [timeframe] with our findings.

[If action is needed: "In the meantime, we recommend
[protective action]."]

Using This Skill

When triaging tickets:

  1. Read the full ticket before categorizing — context in later messages often changes the assessment
  2. Categorize by root cause, not just the symptom described
  3. When in doubt on priority, err on the side of higher — it's easier to de-escalate than to recover from a missed SLA
  4. Always check for duplicates and known issues before routing
  5. Write internal notes that help the next person pick up context quickly
  6. Include what you've already checked or ruled out to avoid duplicate investigation
  7. Flag patterns — if you're seeing the same issue repeatedly, escalate the pattern even if individual tickets are low priority

Source

git clone https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/blob/main/customer-support/skills/ticket-triage/SKILL.mdView on GitHub

Overview

Triage incoming support tickets by assigning a primary (and optional secondary) category, a priority level (P1–P4), and routing recommendations. This process helps high-severity issues get immediate attention and ensures tickets reach the right team with proper context.

How This Skill Works

The skill analyzes ticket text to determine a primary category (Bug, How-to, Feature request, Billing, Account, Integration, Security, Data, Performance) and an optional secondary category. It then applies the Priority Framework (P1–P4) based on impact and urgency, and suggests routing with the necessary context for the assignee.

When to Use It

  • A new ticket arrives and needs immediate prioritization.
  • Assess severity for incidents with data loss, outages, or widespread impact.
  • Decide which team should own an issue based on category and scope.
  • Prioritize issues when multiple tickets affect the same customer or account.
  • Clarify unclear tickets by extracting signals and determining primary/secondary categories.

Quick Start

  1. Step 1: Read ticket text and identify urgency and impact signals.
  2. Step 2: Assign a primary category (and optional secondary) and determine priority (P1–P4).
  3. Step 3: Recommend routing and add concise context for the assignee.

Best Practices

  • Extract clear signals using specific keywords (e.g., crash, login, invoice).
  • When in doubt, lean toward Bug to avoid delaying investigation.
  • Align priority with SLA expectations and communicate updates regularly.
  • Capture the full primary/secondary category and the rationale in the ticket.
  • Validate routing with the on-call engineer or team lead.

Example Use Cases

  • Bug: App crashes on startup for many users; triaged as P1 and routed to Engineering.
  • Feature request: Would be great to export data to CSV; assigned P3 and routed to Product.
  • Billing: Incorrect charge on renewal; assigned P2 to Billing with follow-up on a ticket note.
  • How-to: User cannot locate a setting; P4; routed to Support or Documentation.
  • Security: Suspected data exposure; P1; routed to Security and Engineering with incident protocol.

Frequently Asked Questions

Add this skill to your agents
Sponsor this space

Reach thousands of developers