Get the FREE Ultimate OpenClaw Setup Guide →

technical-research

npx machina-cli add skill aiskillstore/marketplace/technical-research --openclaw
Files (1)
SKILL.md
1.4 KB

Technical Research Skill

Structured approach to technical spikes, proof of concepts, and technology evaluations.

What This Skill Does

  • Conducts timeboxed technical investigations
  • Creates proof of concept implementations
  • Compares technical options objectively
  • Documents findings and recommendations
  • Identifies risks and dependencies
  • Provides implementation paths

When to Use

  • Technology selection decisions
  • Architecture exploration
  • Feasibility studies
  • Performance investigations
  • Library/framework evaluation

Reference Files

  • references/TECHNICAL_SPIKE.template.md - Structured spike investigation format

Spike Structure

  1. Objective - Clear questions to answer
  2. Timebox - Fixed investigation period
  3. Options - Multiple approaches explored
  4. POC - Working code for each option
  5. Comparison - Weighted criteria matrix
  6. Recommendation - Justified decision

Best Practices

  • Define success criteria upfront
  • Explore at least 2-3 options
  • Create runnable POC code
  • Document trade-offs honestly
  • Track unanswered questions
  • Stay within timebox

Source

git clone https://github.com/aiskillstore/marketplace/blob/main/skills/89jobrien/technical-research/SKILL.mdView on GitHub

Overview

The Technical Research Skill provides a structured approach to timeboxed technical spikes, PoCs, and technology evaluations. It helps teams compare options objectively, document findings, identify risks, and outline concrete implementation paths.

How This Skill Works

It starts with an Objective and a Timebox, then explores multiple Options, develops a PoC for each option, compiles a Comparison (criteria matrix), and ends with a Recommendation. This Spike Structure ensures repeatable, transparent evaluations and traceable decision rationale.

When to Use It

  • Technology selection decisions
  • Architecture exploration
  • Feasibility studies
  • Performance investigations
  • Library/framework evaluation

Quick Start

  1. Step 1: Define objective and timebox
  2. Step 2: Build PoCs for at least 2 options
  3. Step 3: Create a comparison and produce a recommendation

Best Practices

  • Define success criteria upfront
  • Explore at least 2-3 options
  • Create runnable POC code
  • Document trade-offs honestly
  • Stay within timebox

Example Use Cases

  • Choosing a database technology for a new service
  • Evaluating frontend UI frameworks for a high traffic app
  • Comparing Kafka vs RabbitMQ for a streaming workload
  • Prototyping a caching layer to speed up a critical path
  • Assessing cloud storage options for archival data

Frequently Asked Questions

Add this skill to your agents
Sponsor this space

Reach thousands of developers