Get the FREE Ultimate OpenClaw Setup Guide →

condition-based-waiting

Scanned
npx machina-cli add skill Microck/ordinary-claude-skills/condition-based-waiting --openclaw
Files (1)
SKILL.md
3.7 KB

Condition-Based Waiting

Overview

Flaky tests often guess at timing with arbitrary delays. This creates race conditions where tests pass on fast machines but fail under load or in CI.

Core principle: Wait for the actual condition you care about, not a guess about how long it takes.

When to Use

digraph when_to_use {
    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" [shape=diamond];
    "Testing timing behavior?" [shape=diamond];
    "Document WHY timeout needed" [shape=box];
    "Use condition-based waiting" [shape=box];

    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" -> "Testing timing behavior?" [label="yes"];
    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Document WHY timeout needed" [label="yes"];
    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Use condition-based waiting" [label="no"];
}

Use when:

  • Tests have arbitrary delays (setTimeout, sleep, time.sleep())
  • Tests are flaky (pass sometimes, fail under load)
  • Tests timeout when run in parallel
  • Waiting for async operations to complete

Don't use when:

  • Testing actual timing behavior (debounce, throttle intervals)
  • Always document WHY if using arbitrary timeout

Core Pattern

// ❌ BEFORE: Guessing at timing
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 50));
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();

// ✅ AFTER: Waiting for condition
await waitFor(() => getResult() !== undefined);
const result = getResult();
expect(result).toBeDefined();

Quick Patterns

ScenarioPattern
Wait for eventwaitFor(() => events.find(e => e.type === 'DONE'))
Wait for statewaitFor(() => machine.state === 'ready')
Wait for countwaitFor(() => items.length >= 5)
Wait for filewaitFor(() => fs.existsSync(path))
Complex conditionwaitFor(() => obj.ready && obj.value > 10)

Implementation

Generic polling function:

async function waitFor<T>(
  condition: () => T | undefined | null | false,
  description: string,
  timeoutMs = 5000
): Promise<T> {
  const startTime = Date.now();

  while (true) {
    const result = condition();
    if (result) return result;

    if (Date.now() - startTime > timeoutMs) {
      throw new Error(`Timeout waiting for ${description} after ${timeoutMs}ms`);
    }

    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 10)); // Poll every 10ms
  }
}

See @example.ts for complete implementation with domain-specific helpers (waitForEvent, waitForEventCount, waitForEventMatch) from actual debugging session.

Common Mistakes

❌ Polling too fast: setTimeout(check, 1) - wastes CPU ✅ Fix: Poll every 10ms

❌ No timeout: Loop forever if condition never met ✅ Fix: Always include timeout with clear error

❌ Stale data: Cache state before loop ✅ Fix: Call getter inside loop for fresh data

When Arbitrary Timeout IS Correct

// Tool ticks every 100ms - need 2 ticks to verify partial output
await waitForEvent(manager, 'TOOL_STARTED'); // First: wait for condition
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 200));   // Then: wait for timed behavior
// 200ms = 2 ticks at 100ms intervals - documented and justified

Requirements:

  1. First wait for triggering condition
  2. Based on known timing (not guessing)
  3. Comment explaining WHY

Real-World Impact

From debugging session (2025-10-03):

  • Fixed 15 flaky tests across 3 files
  • Pass rate: 60% → 100%
  • Execution time: 40% faster
  • No more race conditions

Source

git clone https://github.com/Microck/ordinary-claude-skills/blob/main/skills_all/condition-based-waiting/SKILL.mdView on GitHub

Overview

Flaky tests often rely on arbitrary delays, causing race conditions. Condition-based waiting replaces time-based guesses with polling for actual state changes, reducing flaky behavior and improving reliability in CI and diverse runtimes.

How This Skill Works

Technically, you replace a fixed timeout with a waitFor(predicate, description, timeout). waitFor polls the predicate at a regular interval (about 10ms) until it yields a truthy result, then returns. If the timeout expires, it throws with a descriptive error, helping diagnose why it timed out. Common patterns include waiting for events, state, counts, files, or a complex condition.

When to Use It

  • Tests have arbitrary delays (setTimeout, sleep, time.sleep())
  • Tests are flaky (pass sometimes, fail under load)
  • Tests timeout when run in parallel
  • Waiting for async operations to complete
  • Waiting for a specific state (e.g., machine.state === 'ready')

Quick Start

  1. Step 1: Identify the condition you want to wait for
  2. Step 2: Replace arbitrary delays with waitFor(() => ...)
  3. Step 3: Ensure a timeout and descriptive error, then run tests

Best Practices

  • Use waitFor instead of setTimeout/sleep to align with actual state
  • Poll at a safe interval (around 10ms) to balance responsiveness and CPU
  • Always include a timeout with a clear, descriptive error
  • Call getters inside the loop to avoid stale data
  • Document WHY a timeout is used when relying on arbitrary delays

Example Use Cases

  • Wait for an event: waitFor(() => events.find(e => e.type === 'DONE'))
  • Wait for state: waitFor(() => machine.state === 'ready')
  • Wait for count: waitFor(() => items.length >= 5)
  • Wait for file: waitFor(() => fs.existsSync(path))
  • Complex condition: waitFor(() => obj.ready && obj.value > 10)

Frequently Asked Questions

Add this skill to your agents
Sponsor this space

Reach thousands of developers