linkedin-authority-builder
Scannednpx machina-cli add skill BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills/linkedin-authority-builder --openclawLinkedIn Authority Builder
Here's what most people get wrong about LinkedIn: they're trying to go viral.
Viral doesn't pay your bills. Being remembered by the right 500 people when they need what you do — that pays your bills.
This skill builds a content system around consistent positioning and clear pillars — not hacks.
Context Loading Gates
Before generating any strategy, load:
- Current positioning: One-liner, ICP, key differentiator (load from
positioning-basicsoutput if available) - Target audience on LinkedIn: Specific titles, company stages, industries
- Posting history: What have they tried? What worked? What didn't?
- Content goals: Leads / job offers / speaking / partnerships / audience growth
- Available time per week: Hours they can realistically commit
Sequencing gate: If positioning isn't clear yet, stop and ask:
"Before building a content strategy, I need your one-liner: 'I help [specific audience] with [specific outcome] through [unique approach].' Do you have this locked, or should we nail positioning first with
positioning-basics?"
Do not build a content system for an unclear position — the content will be unfocused.
Also suggest:
"Run
linkedin-profile-optimizerif you haven't — the content we build needs a profile that converts the traffic."
Phase 1: Positioning Alignment Analysis
Before recommending any content, reason through:
- Positioning check: Is the one-liner specific enough to anchor content pillars? If it's "I help businesses grow," that's too vague — push for specificity before proceeding.
- Audience clarity: Are we targeting a specific title + company stage, or a demographic? Specific is better.
- Time-to-output match: If they have 2 hours/week, don't recommend 5 posts/week. Sustainability matters more than ambition.
- Goal alignment: Content for lead generation looks different from content for speaking gigs. Confirm goal before building pillars.
Output a brief strategy assessment:
"You're a [role] targeting [audience] with [X hours/week] and a goal of [outcome]. I'll build a [3/5 post/week] strategy anchored to [X] pillars. The main gap in your current approach: [specific gap]."
Phase 2: Content Pillars (3–5 Required)
Each pillar must pass all 4 tests:
- You have genuine expertise (not just interest)
- Your target audience actively cares about it
- You can produce content on it consistently for 6+ months
- It connects to what you sell or want to be known for
Pillar ratio:
- 70% core expertise → builds authority
- 20% adjacent insights → makes you interesting
- 10% personal → makes you relatable
Output format per pillar:
Pillar: [Name]
Ratio: [%]
Content types: [frameworks / stories / case studies]
Example hook: "[First line of a real post]"
Connection to goal: [how this drives the stated outcome]
Phase 3: Format Selection & Post Templates
Format-to-Goal Mapping
| Format | Best For | Engagement Level |
|---|---|---|
| Story | Connection, memorability | High |
| Framework/List | Authority, credibility | High |
| Hot take | Reach, visibility | Variable |
| Case study/proof | Credibility, late-stage trust | Medium |
| Behind-the-scenes | Relatability, trust | Medium |
Recommended weekly mix:
- 2–3 frameworks (authority)
- 1–2 stories (connection)
- 1 proof point (credibility)
Post Templates
Story Post:
[Hook — the moment or realization]
[Setup — quick context]
[Tension — what was hard or went wrong]
[Turn — the insight]
[Lesson — the takeaway]
[Question — drives engagement]
Framework Post:
[Hook — bold claim or problem statement]
[Why this matters — 1-2 sentences]
[The X-step framework:]
1. [Step + brief explanation]
2. [Step + brief explanation]
3. [Step + brief explanation]
[Key insight or summary]
[CTA or discussion question]
Hot Take:
[Controversial statement]
[Your reasoning — 2-3 sentences]
[The nuance people miss]
[What to do instead]
[Question to drive comments]
Phase 4: Content Calendar with Real Dates
Generate a 4-week calendar with actual dates (not generic day names):
| Date | Pillar | Format | Hook (first line) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [YYYY-MM-DD] | [Pillar] | Framework | "[First line]" | Draft |
| [YYYY-MM-DD] | [Pillar] | Story | "[First line]" | Draft |
Fill 4 full weeks. Generic "Week 1, Monday" output is not sufficient.
Also output 5 starter post hooks ready to write immediately — these break the blank-page problem:
1. [Hook]
2. [Hook]
3. [Hook]
4. [Hook]
5. [Hook]
Phase 5: Self-Critique Pass (REQUIRED)
After generating the strategy, evaluate:
- Is the positioning one-liner specific enough to anchor the pillars?
- Are the 5 starter hooks actually strong — would they stop the scroll?
- Does the time commitment match the user's stated available hours?
- Is at least one pillar directly tied to the revenue/goal outcome?
- Does the calendar have actual dates, or just generic "Day 1/Day 3" placeholders?
- Would this content system still work in 6 months if the user stays consistent?
Flag issues: "Pillar 3 ('general business tips') doesn't connect to your stated goal of attracting SaaS founders. Replace with something more specific."
Phase 6: 30-Day Iteration Protocol
After 30 days, review with these questions:
- Which posts got the most comments? What pillar did they fall under?
- Which posts drove DMs or profile views?
- Which posts got the most impressions regardless of engagement?
Adjust based on data:
- If case study posts outperform frameworks → increase case study ratio
- If stories drive DMs but frameworks drive impressions → use both intentionally
Output Structure
## LinkedIn Strategy: [Name] — [Date]
### Positioning Alignment
[One-liner + assessment of clarity]
### Content Pillars
[3-5 pillars with ratio, examples, connection to goal]
### Weekly Rhythm
- Posts/week: [X]
- Best times: [e.g., Tue/Thu 8am EST]
- Active commenting: [X min/day]
### Format Mix
[Breakdown with rationale]
### 4-Week Content Calendar
[Table with real dates + hooks]
### 5 Starter Posts (Write These First)
[Hooks with format labels]
### Engagement Plan
[Who to engage with, how much time, what to say]
### Self-Critique Notes
[Issues flagged + recommended fixes]
### 30-Day Review Triggers
[What to measure and when to adjust]
### Cross-References
- linkedin-profile-optimizer (run before publishing)
- content-idea-generator (for ongoing idea generation)
- voice-extractor (to ensure posts sound authentic)
Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com
Source
git clone https://github.com/BrianRWagner/ai-marketing-claude-code-skills/blob/main/linkedin-authority-builder/SKILL.mdView on GitHub Overview
This skill builds a repeatable LinkedIn content system anchored by clear positioning and 3–5 content pillars. It emphasizes consistent posting rhythm, pillar balance, and practical formats to establish authority, attract inbound leads, and sustain growth—without chasing viral hacks.
How This Skill Works
It starts by loading your current positioning, target LinkedIn audience, posting history, content goals, and available time. Then Phase 2 defines 3–5 pillars with a 70/20/10 composition, maps formats to goals, and sets a sustainable posting rhythm. Finally, it provides post templates (Story, Framework, Case study, etc.) and a real-world format guide to execute a consistent content pipeline.
When to Use It
- You need to establish authority on LinkedIn and attract inbound leads.
- You want a sustainable content routine tailored to your weekly time constraints.
- Your current positioning is unclear or too vague and needs sharpening.
- You’re focusing on lead generation, speaking engagements, or partnerships through consistent content.
- You want to ensure your profile converts traffic by running the linkedin-profile-optimizer before posting.
Quick Start
- Step 1: Load current positioning, ICP, content goals, and available weekly hours.
- Step 2: Define 3–5 pillars with a 70/20/10 content mix and map preferred formats to goals.
- Step 3: Use Story and Framework templates, plan the posting rhythm, and start publishing.
Best Practices
- Anchor every pillar in genuine expertise with a clear value proposition.
- Follow the 70/20/10 pillar ratio to balance authority, adjacent insights, and relatability.
- Favor high-impact formats (story and framework) and maintain a consistent weekly mix.
- Keep the posting rhythm aligned to the hours you can realistically commit (e.g., 3–5 posts/week).
- Iterate using feedback and data from posting history to continually refine pillars and formats.
Example Use Cases
- Founder in SaaS builds pillars around product-led growth, customer outcomes, and industry insights; posts 3–4 times per week using Story and Framework formats.
- Consultant positions as a leadership coach focusing on team productivity and remote work, delivering 2–3 posts weekly with case studies and frameworks.
- B2B marketer centers content on demand-gen strategies, ICP-specific pain points, and personal storytelling; maintains a 4-post weekly rhythm.
- Freelance designer emphasizes portfolio outcomes, process transparency, and client stories; uses a mix of frameworks and behind-the-scenes posts.
- Tech executive creates pillar content on market trends, product strategy, and hiring signals; posts a steady 2–3 times weekly to stay top of mind.